ReviewArchives of dermatological research2025
A comprehensive review of 21 common dermatology smartphone applications: evaluating socioeconomic and geographical barriers.
Review in Archives of dermatological research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of the study was to identify areas for improvement in cost, geographical accessibility, and language diversity in current dermatologic education smartphone applications (apps). Education is a critical component of improving patient health outcomes. Smartphone apps offer accessible tools for managing and monitoring dermatological health, helping to reduce educational and geographical barriers that patients may face. By providing easily accessible information and tracking capabilities, these apps may empower patients to take an active role in their health care. Apps were selected based on purpose, included features, and user demographics (specifically patient-directed). Apps were divided into categories related to dermatological health, including patient education, skin-care regimens, and tracking chronic condition progression. Selected apps were assessed by the following: cost, languages offered, educational content, diagnostic/special features, country based in, the country provided in, advertisements, and incentives. Of the 21 apps analyzed, 65% are only available in English, 17% offer 2-3 languages, and 18% offer 4 + languages, although these apps are available in multiple countries. Chronic condition management apps were predominantly free, 40% of patient education apps were free, and 55% of diagnostic apps were free. 67% of apps provided an educational component, with five including incentives for use. Utilizing mobile applications is a promising and innovative avenue for patient education. However, there is a vast imbalance in the number of languages offered and cost, highlighting the need to create smartphone apps available in multiple languages at a low price.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39954102What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.