ArticleUrolithiasis2025
An analysis of the burden of urolithiasis: differences between the global, China, India and the United States, with projections through 2050.
Article in Urolithiasis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- The efficacy and safety of adrenergic alpha-antagonists combined with PDE5 inhibitors in the medical expulsive therapy for unilateral distal ureteral stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Article
- Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Patients with Urolithiasis Regarding Stone Examination Methods: A Cross-Sectional Study in China.Patient preference and adherence · 2026Article
- Multi-habitat microbiome profiling identifies habitat-dependent alterations and complementary discriminatory information in urolithiasis.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Enhancing Percutaneous Access: The «GENOA» Prone Modified Position.Research and reports in urology · 2026Article
- Active Propelled Micro Robots in Drug Delivery for Urologic Diseases.Micromachines · 2025Review
- Trends and burden of urolithiasis in China, 1990-2021: a systematic analysis of the global burden of disease study 2021 with future projections to 2036.World journal of urology · 2025Article
- Does the use of a ureteral access sheath improve perioperative outcomes in ureteroscopy? A real-world multi-institutional study.Urolithiasis · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This report analyzes the patterns of urolithiasis in China, India, the United States, and globally from 1990 to 2021 using data from the Global Burden of Disease Study (GBD) 2021. Various techniques such as the Joinpoint model, age-period-cohort analysis, decomposition analysis, health inequities analysis, and the Bayesian age-period-cohort model were applied. According to the Joinpoint model, the average annual percent change (AAPC) for incidence, disability-adjusted life years, and mortality related to urolithiasis globally was negative. However, Indian women showed a positive AAPC of 0.20 in age-standardized incidence rate (ASIR). Both sexes in the United States showed positive AAPCs for age-standardized mortality rate (ASMR). The age-period-cohort analysis indicates that the peak ASIR occurs around ages 50-60. According to decomposition analysis, the main factors contributing to the rising burden of urolithiasis are population aging and growth, whereas changes in the disease's epidemiology slow its growth. Health inequities analysis shows increasing disparities between regions with high and low socio-demographic index (SDI). Forecasting models predict continued rise in prevalence without intervention. Overall, among the three countries, India faces the highest health burden, particularly among younger populations and women, whereas the United States experiences higher mortality rates among the elderly. Despite significant progress made by China in controlling urinary health burdens over the past three decades, the high incidence of urolithiasis and its subsequent impacts remain a concern, particularly in light of the country's demographic structure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39954073What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.