ArticleEuropean archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience2026
Silexan is well-tolerated for long-term use in adults and for treatment of adolescents: a real-world data analysis.
Article in European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
For Silexan, a proprietary preparation of Lavandula angustifolia flowers, efficacy and tolerability in adults with anxiety disorders was demonstrated in clinical trials lasting up to 10 weeks. The present study investigated the extent and tolerability of long-term and adolescent use in real world. For the retrospective analysis of patients with a first prescription for Silexan, case-based information provided by office-based physicians from Germany was extracted from the IQVIA Disease Analyzer (DA) database. Patients treated by general practitioners and specialists were analysed. Proportions of patients with long-term therapy (> 3 months, > 6 months) and adolescent patients (aged 12-17 years) were determined, incidence rates of diagnoses or complaints compatible with known adverse effects before and after therapy initiation were estimated. Long-term usage was additionally analysed by data from the Swiss longitudinal prescription (LRx) database, which covers approximately 50% of pharmacies and most physicians of Switzerland. 67,340 adults (DA 36,664, LRx 30,676) with at least one Silexan prescription were analysed. Of these, 4.0% (DA) and 27.6% (LRx) had more than 3 months of therapy. DA data included 483 (1.3%) adolescent patients. Diagnoses or complaints compatible with known adverse effects were rare among long-term or adolescent Silexan users and did not differ significantly during the period of Silexan therapy compared to an equivalent period before Silexan therapy. Our findings suggest that Silexan is a frequently used and well-tolerated treatment option for individuals requiring extended relief from their symptoms. It might provide a well-tolerated pharmacologic treatment option for adolescents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.