ArticleTropical animal health and production2025
Formic and propionic acids' effectiveness on laying hens' productivity and egg quality, utilization of nutrients and some blood profiles during the early production phase.
Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dietary Acidifier Modulates the Gut Microbiota-Metabolic Axis to Improve Intestinal Health, Yolk Fatty Acid Profiles, and Egg Quality in Laying Hens.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Impact of Drinking Water Supplemented with Complex Acidifiers on Production Performance, Egg Quality, Physiological and Biochemical Indicators, and Microbial Flora of BIAN Chickens.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of organic acids as growth promoters in poultry diets continues to pique the researchers' curiosity. So, this study aims to investigate the effect of feeding formic acid, propionic acid, or both in their pure form on laying hens' productivity, egg quality, nutrient utilization, and some blood profiles during the early production phase using eighty ISA Brown laying hens aged 28-42 weeks. The hens were randomly assigned into four groups, each consisting of 10 replicates with 2 hens/replicate. The treatments were C (control), F (1 ml formic acid/kg diet), P (1 ml propionic acid/kg), and M (0.5 ml formic acid and 0.5 ml propionic acid/kg). The percentage of egg production, egg mass (P < 0.05), albumen crude protein percent, and estradiol hormone (P < 0.001) were significantly increased upon acids' mixture treatment, whereas the percentages of albumen fat (P < 0.05) and yolk fat (P = 0.0006) were significantly decreased. Formic acid significantly increased the percentages of shell calcium (P = 0.0001) and yolk (P < 0.01) and decreased albumen percent (P < 0.01). The acids' mixture produced the lowest plasma cholesterol value (P = 0.0001), which was followed by formic acid treatment. Unlike the control, the experimental treatments significantly increased Haugh unit, albumen index (P < 0.05), crude protein retention percent (P < 0.01), and decreased plasma triglycerides (P = 0.0007). According to the findings, early-phase laying hens' diets supplemented with a pure blend of propionic and formic acids produced more eggs and had higher egg quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.