ArticleJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2025
The impact of thrombophilia on in-hospital outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome: insights from the United States National Inpatient Sample.
Article in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The prevalence of thrombophilia among patients who are hospitalized with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and whether the condition affects outcomes is unknown. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients hospitalized with ACS by analyzing data from the United State National Inpatient Sample (NIS) between 2016 and 2021. Multiple logistic and linear regressions were used to determine the association between thrombophilia and in-hospital mortality, length of stay and cost. There were a total of 5,627,065 hospital admissions with ACS and 43,040 had thrombophilia (0.76%). Patients with thrombophilia were younger (median age 66 vs. 69 years, p < 0.001) and a lower prevalence of hypertension (76.9% vs. 81.8%, p < 0.001), hypercholesterolemia (54.7% vs. 62.9%, p < 0.001), and diabetes mellitus (39.0% vs. 42.0%, p < 0.001). Fewer patients underwent coronary angiography (40.1% vs. 49.6%, p < 0.001), percutaneous coronary intervention (25.3% vs. 34.4%, p < 0.001), and coronary artery bypass grafting (4.7% vs. 6.5%, p < 0.001). The in-hospital mortality rate was significantly higher in the patients with thrombophilia (13.2% vs. 8.4%, p < 0.001) as well as higher length of stay (median 5 vs. 3 days, p < 0.001) and costs (median $20,744 vs. $16,907, p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, thrombophilia was associated with increased in-hospital mortality (OR 1.52 95%CI 1.42-1.63, p < 0.001), length of stay (coefficient 2.14 95%CI 1.99 to 2.29, p < 0.001) and cost (coefficient $8,123 95%CI 7,477 to 8.768, p < 0.001). Patients with thrombophilia and ACS have less traditional risk factors for coronary heart disease but a greater mortality, length of stay and cost compared to ACS patients without thrombophilia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39954039What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.