ArticleAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2025
Optimizing the discovery bioanalysis strategy for macrocyclic peptides.
Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Macrocyclic peptides (MCPs) have remained a compelling modality in drug discovery and development, with many successful marketed drugs. Their unique molecular structure and ADME properties have posed bioanalytical challenges that cannot be fully addressed with conventional small molecule LC-MRM assays. In this work, we developed and optimized a high-throughput discovery bioanalytical strategy for MCPs with 16 marketed MCP drugs. By evaluating ten different sample extraction methods based on the recovery and matrix effect, we identified that the protein precipitation extraction with MeOH/ACN (1/1 v/v) with 0.5% FA outperformed the other sample extraction methods, achieving 80% recovery for 80% of the MCP drugs and 90% matrix effect for 90% of the MCP drugs. By assessing the sensitivity of the targeted-selected ion monitoring (t-SIM) and parallel reaction monitoring (PRM) on the Orbitrap HRMS and comparing with the conventional LC-MRM, we concluded that the t-SIM provided comparable sensitivity with MRM (LOQ at 1~3 ng/mL for the majority of the MCP drugs), with the extra benefits of minimal method development and high post-acquisition flexibility in data processing. The optimized bioanalytical strategy was applied to various biological matrices and displayed performance that met the quantitation requirements for discovery bioanalysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39954031What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.