Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39953967›Full record

ArticleThe Gerontologist2025

A Phenomenological Understanding of Aging "Well" With Multiple Sclerosis.

Emma V Richardson, Robert W Motl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Gerontologist, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Emma V RichardsonSchool of Sport and Exercise Sciences, University of Worcester, Worcester, Worcestershire, UK.
Robert W MotlDepartment of Kinesiology and Nutrition, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Funding

Healthy Aging through LifesTyle (HALT) Research Centre CA-1708-25059
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesAs the life expectancy of the multiple sclerosis (MS) community increases, new innovations and understandings of what it is to age "well" are needed. Building on a line of work exploring the meaning and experiences of aging with a disabling condition, and showing how and why people aging with MS experience this phenomenon differently, this paper progresses aging and disability literature by (re)conceptualizing what "wellbeing" means to people aging with MS, and how wellbeing may be enhanced or compromised. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsWorking with 40 persons with MS over the age of 60, we used a Heideggerian phenomenological framework to co-construct what wellbeing meant among persons aging with MS.

resultsEmphasizing the importance of the "everdayness" of wellbeing experiences, persons aging with MS discussed how wellbeing was related to "doing, being, and becoming; the ability to do the things they wanted to do, be the person they wanted to be, and the autonomy, opportunity, and ability to do something, or become someone, different." The ability to be, do or become was, however, dependent on, "the power of people," "sociocultural privilege" and "writing one's own health narrative." DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: These findings, that are contextualized within the sociocultural boundaries of participants' situations, can help support persons with MS, families and friends, caregivers, health care professionals and interventionists that are working towards enhancing quality of life among persons aging with MS.

Indexed as

AgingMultiple SclerosisQuality of LifeAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPersons with DisabilitiesbecomingbeingdoingHeideggarianhermeneutic

Identifiers

PMID39953967
PMCPMC12105571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.