Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39953944›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of primary health care2025

Worries and information seeking during pregnancy: a cross-sectional study among 1402 expectant Norwegian women active on social media platforms.

Mari Hegnes Hansen, Hanna Sandbakken Mørkved, Bjarne Austad, Gunnhild Åberge Vie, Linn Okkenhaug Getz, Bente Prytz Mjølstad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of primary health care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mari Hegnes HansenDepartment of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, General Practice Research Unit, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0009-0008-8600-5748
Hanna Sandbakken MørkvedDepartment of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, General Practice Research Unit, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0009-0002-3230-8475
Bjarne AustadDepartment of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, General Practice Research Unit, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-1638-6879
Gunnhild Åberge VieDepartment of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, General Practice Research Unit, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-1552-5291
Linn Okkenhaug GetzDepartment of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, General Practice Research Unit, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-0405-7752
Bente Prytz MjølstadDepartment of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, General Practice Research Unit, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-0677-3007

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPregnant women often navigate extensive information from healthcare professionals, social networks and online sources, which can increase anxiety. Understanding their concerns and preferred information sources is crucial for effective antenatal care.

objectiveTo explore worries and information-seeking behaviour among pregnant women in Norway using social media.

methodsAn anonymous, web-based survey was conducted among 1402 pregnant women in Norway from January to March 2022, distributed via Facebook and Instagram. The survey covered 11 pregnancy worries, eight postpartum worries, information sources and thoughts regarding childbirth.

resultsNearly, all participants had concerns, mainly about foetal anomalies (99%,

conclusionsPregnancy and postpartum worries are widespread among pregnant women using social media, especially among first-time mothers and those with financial insecurity. Most pregnant women prefer quality-assured websites and healthcare personnel for information. Antenatal care could benefit from offering more tailored information and follow-up, particularly for first-time mothers and financially insecure women.

Indexed as

AnxietyInformation Seeking BehaviorPregnant PeopleSocial MediaAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansNorwayPostpartum PeriodPregnancyPrenatal CareSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adultinformation seekingPregnancy caresocial mediasurveyworries

Identifiers

PMID39953944
PMCPMC12090261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.