ArticleCancer medicine2025
Improving Radiotherapy Plan Quality for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma With Enhanced UNet Dose Prediction.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep-Learning-Based 3D Dose Distribution Prediction for VMAT Lung Cancer Treatment Using an Enhanced UNet3D Architecture with Composite Loss Functions.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIndividualized dose prediction is critical for optimizing radiation treatment planning. This study introduces DESIRE, an enhanced UNet-based dose prediction model with progrEssive feature fuSion and dIfficult Region lEarning, tailored for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients receiving volumetric modulated arc therapy. We aimed to assess the impact of integrating DESIRE into the treatment planning process to improve plan quality.
methodsThis retrospective study included 131 NPC patients diagnosed at Jiangxi Cancer Hospital between 2017 and 2020. Twenty patients were randomly allocated to a testing cohort, while the remaining 111 comprised a training cohort. Target delineation included three planning target volumes (PTVs): PTV70, PTV60, and PTV55, along with several organs at risk (OARs). The DESIRE model predicted dose distributions, and discrepancies between DESIRE's predictions and the ground truth (GT) were quantified using dosimetric metrics and gamma pass rates. Two junior physicians used DESIRE's predictions for treatment planning, and their plans were compared to the GT.
resultsMost of DESIRE's predicted dosimetric metrics closely aligned with GT (mean difference < 1 Gy), with no significant differences (p > 0.05) in D
conclusionsThe DESIRE model shows promise for patient-specific dose prediction, enhancing junior physicians' treatment planning capabilities and improving plan quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.