ArticleClinical oral implants research2025
Accuracy of a Novel Robot-Assisted System and Dynamic Navigation System for Dental Implant Placement: A Clinical Retrospective Study.
Article in Clinical oral implants research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Accuracy of Static, Dynamic, and Robotic Guided Surgery in Immediate Implant Placement: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.Clinical oral implants research · 2026Pooled it
- Accuracy of robotic systems in dental implant placement with clinical subgroup analyses: A systematic review and meta-analysis.The Japanese dental science review · 2026Review
- Robotic Guidance and Optical Navigation for Precision Implant Placement: a Prospective Comparative Clinical Study.Maedica · 2026Article
- Comparative Analysis of Implant Placement Accuracy Using Augmented Reality Technology Versus 3D-Printed Surgical Guides: A Controlled In Vitro Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Dynamic and Robotic Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery-A Possible Workflow for the Future?Australian dental journal · 2025Review
- Accuracy of Navigation and Robot-Assisted Systems for Dental Implant Placement: A Systematic Review.Dentistry journal · 2025Review
- Evaluation of the accuracy of semi-autonomous robotic system versus dynamic navigation in completely edentulous implant surgery: an in vitro study.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Precision excision of mandibular anterior compound odontoma using autonomous robotic guidance: a clinical case report.Frontiers in oral health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimThis clinical retrospective study aimed to compare the deviations in single-tooth implant placement using novel semi-autonomous robotic-assisted surgery system (sa-RASS) and dynamic navigation system (DNS) methods. MATERIALS AND
methodsA retrospective analysis of medical records from January to December 2023 was conducted to compare the implantation accuracy of the sa-RASS and DNS in partially edentulous patients using cone-beam computed tomography. Platform, apex, and angular deviations were measured and analyzed. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to check the data distribution, along with t-tests or Mann-Whitney U-tests, where appropriate.
resultsFifty-seven patients (57 implants) were analyzed: 29 (29 implants) in the sa-RASS group and 28 (28 implants) in the DNS group. The comparison of platform, apex, and angular deviation between the sa-RASS group and DNS group were 0.91 ± 0.46 mm vs. 1.26 ± 0.51 mm (p < 0.001), 1.06 ± 0.60 mm vs. 1.51 ± 0.56 mm (p < 0.001), and 3.07° ± 1.66° vs. 3.71° ± 1.64° (p > 0.05), respectively. In addition, there was no significant difference in the accuracy of different implant regions (premolar, molar, maxilla, and mandible) or implant length (p > 0.05).
conclusionsIn the present study, sa-RASS implant placement showed better positional accuracy than DNS implant placement in platform and apex deviation, although these improvements in accuracy may have limited clinical relevance, suggesting that the sa-RASS might be advantageous in dental implant surgery.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: ChiCTR2400085089.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.