ReviewMicroscopy (Oxford, England)2025
Unraveling the neural code: analysis of large-scale two-photon microscopy data.
Review in Microscopy (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- NeuroSeg-MF: robust neuron segmentation in two-photon CaBiomedical optics express · 2026Article
- Second harmonic generation for brain imaging: pathology-related studies.Biophysical reviews · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The brain is an intricate neuronal network that orchestrates our thoughts, emotions and actions through dynamic interactions between neurons. If we could record the activity of all neurons simultaneously in detail, it could revolutionize our understanding of brain function and lead to breakthroughs in treating neurological diseases. Recent technological innovations, particularly in large field-of-view two-photon microscopes, have made it possible to record the activity of tens of thousands of neurons simultaneously. However, the size and complexity of the datasets present significant challenges in extracting interpretable information. Conventional analysis methods are often insufficient, necessitating the development of new theoretical frameworks and computational efficiencies. In this review, we describe the characteristics of the data obtained from advanced imaging techniques and discuss analytical methods to facilitate mutual understanding between experimentalists and theorists. This interdisciplinary approach is crucial for effectively managing and interpreting large-scale neural activity datasets, ultimately advancing our understanding of brain function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.