Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39953796›Full record

ReviewMicroscopy (Oxford, England)2025

Unraveling the neural code: analysis of large-scale two-photon microscopy data.

Yoshihito Saito, Yuma Osako, Masanori Murayama

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microscopy (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yoshihito SaitoLaboratory for Haptic Perception and Cognitive Physiology, RIKEN Center for Brain Science, 2-1 Hirosawa, Wako-shi, Saitama 351-0198, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3848-9000
Yuma OsakoLaboratory for Haptic Perception and Cognitive Physiology, RIKEN Center for Brain Science, 2-1 Hirosawa, Wako-shi, Saitama 351-0198, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7214-4076
Masanori MurayamaLaboratory for Haptic Perception and Cognitive Physiology, RIKEN Center for Brain Science, 2-1 Hirosawa, Wako-shi, Saitama 351-0198, Japan.

Funding

Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development JP15dm0207001 JP23wm0625001Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP20H05775 JP24H02313Toray Science Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The brain is an intricate neuronal network that orchestrates our thoughts, emotions and actions through dynamic interactions between neurons. If we could record the activity of all neurons simultaneously in detail, it could revolutionize our understanding of brain function and lead to breakthroughs in treating neurological diseases. Recent technological innovations, particularly in large field-of-view two-photon microscopes, have made it possible to record the activity of tens of thousands of neurons simultaneously. However, the size and complexity of the datasets present significant challenges in extracting interpretable information. Conventional analysis methods are often insufficient, necessitating the development of new theoretical frameworks and computational efficiencies. In this review, we describe the characteristics of the data obtained from advanced imaging techniques and discuss analytical methods to facilitate mutual understanding between experimentalists and theorists. This interdisciplinary approach is crucial for effectively managing and interpreting large-scale neural activity datasets, ultimately advancing our understanding of brain function.

Indexed as

BrainMicroscopy, Fluorescence, MultiphotonNerve NetNeuronsAnimalsHumansImage Processing, Computer-Assisteddata processinglarge field-of-view two-photon microscopyneural activityneural populationneuronal networksingle neuron

Identifiers

PMID39953796
PMCPMC12236074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.