ArticleJournal of intensive care2025
External validation and comparative performance of the SLANT score for neuroprognostication in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survivors undergoing targeted temperature management: insights from an Asian cohort.
Article in Journal of intensive care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The association between ABO blood type and outcomes following sudden cardiac arrest: a multicenter observational study.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNeurological outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) depend on multiple factors, including the patient's baseline condition and post-arrest management. The SLANT, developed specifically for OHCA survivors treated with targeted temperature management (TTM), requires further validation, particularly in Asian populations.
methodsThis multicenter retrospective cohort study analyzed data from 2016 to 2023, examining demographics, pre-arrest conditions, resuscitation events, and laboratory biomarkers following TTM. The primary outcome was defined as a poor neurological outcome at hospital discharge. Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the included variables.
resultsA total of 448 eligible adult patients were included, of whom 77.9% experienced poor neurological outcomes at discharge. The performance of the current cohort was comparable to that of the original SLANT cohort, achieving an area under the curve of 0.797 (95% confidence interval: 0.746-0.849). All five factors of the SLANT score remained statistically significant in predicting poor neurological outcomes. At a cutoff of ≥ 6.5, the SLANT score demonstrated a specificity of 53.5% and positive predictive value (PPV) of 86.9%. Increasing the cutoff value to 8.5 improved the specificity to 66.7% and the PPV to 89.6%.
conclusionThe SLANT showed high PPV for predicting poor neurological outcomes at discharge in patients with OHCA undergoing TTM across a multicenter Asian cohort. Combining the score with other neurological assessments is recommended for improved neuroprognostication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.