ReviewBiomedical engineering online2025
A review on diagnostic assessments of tracheal stenosis.
Review in Biomedical engineering online, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- In-silico investigation into optimal photoacoustic probe design using a digital thyroid phantom.Journal of biomedical optics · 2027Article
- Reinforcement of skin flap tracheal reconstruction with porous titanium nickelide implants: A novel approach to persistent tracheal defect closure.JTCVS techniques · 2026Article
- Application of confocal laser endomicroscopy in the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions: a narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
- Article
- Computational fluid dynamics as an objective measure for assessing congenital tracheal stenosis: Proof-of-concept study.JTCVS open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tracheal stenosis (TS) is a pathological condition characterized by a reduction in the trachea diameter. It is a common complication after prolonged endotracheal intubation but may also arise from autoimmune or inflammatory processes. Clinicians can select the most appropriate treatment option based on individual patient conditions. Therefore, precise localization and evaluation of the stenosis are essential to ensure safe and effective treatment. This review summarizes current research on TS diagnosis and assessment, encompassing functional, imaging, and bronchoscopy methods. The characteristics, advantages, and disadvantages of each technique are discussed in relation to their application in the diagnosis and assessment of TS. Bronchoscopy is considered the cornerstone of TS diagnosis, and novel adjunct imaging modalities have emerged to enhance its accuracy. We explore advanced endomicroscopic methods, such as endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS), photoacoustic endoscopy (PAE), optical coherence tomography (OCT), and confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE). Among these, EBUS is clinically approved for diagnosing lesions with high resolution and acceptable penetration depth. OCT and CLE offer real-time imaging for peripheral lesions and potentially malignant nodules, but their use is limited by cost and availability in low-resource settings. Therefore, bronchoscopy, with biopsy techniques as needed, remains the optimal approach for diagnosing tracheal stenosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.