Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39953564›Full record

ArticleItalian journal of pediatrics2025

Current practices in neonatal pain management: a decade after the last Italian survey.

Paola Lago, Elisabetta Garetti, Patrizia Savant Levet, Immacolata Arenga, Anna Pirelli, Anna Chiara Frigo, Daniele Merazzi, on behalf Pain Study Group of Italian Society of Neonatology

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Italian journal of pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Paola LagoNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Critical Care Department, Ca' Foncello Regional Hospital, Treviso, 31100, Italy. paolalago9@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4866-0775
Elisabetta GarettiNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Women's and Children's Health Department, Azienda Ospedaliera-University of Modena, Modena, Italy.
Patrizia Savant LevetNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Maria Vittoria Hospital, ASL Città Di Torino, Turin, Italy.
Immacolata ArengaNeonatal Intensive Care Unit University P.O. Sant'Anna A.O.U., Città Della Salute e della Scienza Di Torino, Turin, Italy.
Anna PirelliPediatric - Neonatologist, Milan, Italy.
Anna Chiara FrigoDepartment of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Daniele MerazziMother's and Infant's Department, Valduce Hospital, Como, Italy.
on behalf Pain Study Group of Italian Society of Neonatology

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeonates admitted to neonatal intensive care units (NICUs), as well as maternity nurseries, typically undergo painful invasive procedures during their hospital stay. We aim to report on current bedside analgesia/sedation and pain assessment practices, 10 years after the previous Italian survey.

methodsThis study employed a cross-sectional electronic survey. A 21-item questionnaire was distributed to directors of birth centers and NICUs to ascertain the policy for pain assessment and management in their respective units. A separate questionnaire was dispatched to neonatologists and nurses registered with the Italian Society of Neonatology. They reported on the analgesic strategies implemented for various painful bedside procedures. Both non-pharmacological and pharmacological analgesia interventions, as well as pain assessment, were analyzed. A regression model was utilized to identify factors that predict pain management practices.

resultsData on pain management practices were collected from the directors of 153 NICUs and birth centers. Of these, 88.9% reported pain control following guidelines and 47.7% confirmed the presence of a local pain specialist promoting pain management in their unit. A minority, ranging from 16.3% to 41.8%, reported the use of a pain scale, a finding corroborated by the 200 doctors and 239 nurses who responded. At least one non pharmacological intervention (i.e., pacifier, sweet solution, or sensory saturation) was reported in 97.8% of the heel lances performed in the NICU and 96.5% in the maternity nursery, meanwhile for intramuscular injections in 73.8% and 70.3%, respectively. Additionally, it was reported that 22.9% of laryngoscopies were still performed without analgesia. Observations were made over 297 mechanical ventilation and 277 non-invasive ventilation courses, with non-pharmacological analgesia administered in 56.4% and 86.9% and the use of analgesic or sedative drugs in 81.7% and 17.1% of the cases, respectively. Furthermore, routine pain assessment was only undertaken in 68.0% and 64.9% of the cases.

conclusionsWe found a largely common propensity among Italian directors, neonatologists, and nurses to perform analgesic interventions for the most frequently encountered invasive neonatal painful procedures, though the practices are still highly variable. The availability of written guidelines and local pain specialists are confirmed as factors that contribute to the proper management of pain. However, pain assessment is still inadequate and urgently needs to be implemented to allow for tailored pain and stress control and prevention in all infants.

Indexed as

Pain ManagementPractice Patterns, Physicians'AnalgesiaAnalgesicsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, NeonatalItalyMalePain MeasurementSurveys and QuestionnairesAnalgesicsAnalgesicNewborn and pretermNon-pharmacological and pharmacological interventionsOpioidsPainPain assessmentSedative

Identifiers

PMID39953564
PMCPMC11829570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.