ArticleBMC health services research2025
Job incentives influencing health professionals working in rural and remote areas in Thailand: finding from discrete choice experiment to policy recommendation.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Specialists' Perceptions of Workforce Retention Strategies in the Malaysian Ministry of Health and Their Association With Job Satisfaction and Turnover Intention: Protocol for a REDCap-Based National Cross-Sectional Survey.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Global Perspectives in Plastic Surgery: View of Plastic Surgeons From Vietnam.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- Incentives on the motivation and job performance; insights from community health workers in Iran.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- The role and value of self-employed nurses in the allocation of nursing human resources: A scoping review.International journal of nursing sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis research aims to understand job incentives of health professionals who work in rural and remote areas, which could lead to the further development of policy proposals.
methodsThe study design has been applied discrete choice experiment (DCE) to determine attribute preferences of: 1) doctors, dentists, and pharmacists, and 2) nurses and interdisciplinary teams. Four areas in northern Thailand were purposively selected. To determine the attributes and levels, a qualitative method was employed. An orthogonal array was adopted to produce 16 options for categorizing the employment preferences of each person. Conditional and mixed logit regressions were used to examine the major incentives influencing health workforce decision-making. In addition, willingness to pay (WTP) analysis according to beta coefficients from the regression models was performed.
resultsThe total number of participants in the first group was 34, and the latter group included 160 participants. Financial incentives, suitable accommodation, workload and job post in hometown were all significant criteria for both groups. Surprisingly, opportunity to continue study was not a significant consideration for doctors, dentists, or pharmacists to work in remote areas. When getting a 40% higher income than counterparts working in public hospitals in urban regions, the decision-making level among doctors, dentists and pharmacists influenced decisions by 4.2 times, while nurses and interdisciplinary teams were influenced twice as much. Regarding the WTP analysis, doctors, pharmacists, and dentists were willing to receive 8,126 (95% CI: 3,477; 15,442) Baht per month, and nurses and interdisciplinary teams were willing to receive 7,733 (95% CI: 4,926; 11,502) Baht per month to work more than 48 h per week. The results of mixed and conditional logit models were found consistently.
conclusionFinancial subsidies for all types of healthcare workers in rural and remote areas remain effective policies and need to be maintained. It is not merely a matter of national policy; hospital-level policies can change and contribute to resolving the problem of health personnel shortages. The short-term plan for retaining health staff would be to provide suitable, safe, and satisfying accommodations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.