ArticleBMC medical education2025
An identity on guard: the impact of microaggressions on the professional identity formation of residents.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Experienced or witnessed racism and microaggressions during medical education: an exploratory survey of medical learners at a large Canadian medical school.Canadian medical education journal · 2026Article
- Association between adverse practice experiences and positional competence among residents: a multicenter cross-sectional study.BMC medical education · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe development of a strong professional identity in medicine has important consequences for patient care, as proper identity formation impacts a physician's confidence, wellbeing, and performance. In non-medical professions, exposure to discrimination and stigma impacts how individuals construct their professional identity. Our study aims to explore how microaggressions from peers impact the professional identity formation of resident physicians. This work was guided by conceptual frameworks on professional identity formation that included socialization, role modelling, and hierarchical structures.
methodsWe conducted semi-structured interviews with [blinded] residents between July 2021 and November 2022. Participants were recruited utilizing both convenience and snowball sampling of residents who self-identified as having experienced microaggressions. During the iterative data collection, we adopted thematic analysis using open coding to identify overarching themes.
resultsWe interviewed 17 residents from five specialties. Overall, participants perceived that experiencing microaggressions impacted their sense of belonging in medicine, and had a negative impact on participants' progression in residency due to feelings of perceived incompetence, exhaustion at work, and missed opportunities. Participants also felt like they had to guard the diverse aspects of their identities to mitigate the experience of microaggressions. Barriers in addressing microaggressions included fear of personal and professional repercussions, and a sense of futility that reporting would lead to tangible change. More education about microaggressions, increasing transparency on reporting microaggressions, access to open-minded mentors, and creating a safe space to debrief may help mitigate the negative impacts of microaggressions on professional identity formation.
conclusionsOur study suggests that microaggressions between peers are a barrier to trainees' socialization into the medical profession, as they lead to feelings of exclusion and exhaustion that impact clinical performance. Education on how to identify, report and respond to microaggressions will help to improve the learning environment for vulnerable trainees.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.