ArticleBMC public health2025
The spatial heterogeneity effects of street environmental factors on the preference for sports and leisure cycling paths across different street types.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Assessing the Impact of Sharrows on Bicyclist Behavior: A three-year natural experiment in Santa Ana, California.Journal of healthy eating and active living · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Current research has not fully explored how streetscape elements in different street spaces affect long-distance, high-speed recreational cycling. As a result, the applicability of existing findings across different street environments is limited, hindering their practical value in urban street design. To address this issue, this study focuses on the core urban area of Hangzhou, China. Streets are functionally categorized based on Point of Interest (POI) data, and Strava crowdsourced data are used to obtain cycling activity trajectories. Streetscape indicators that may influence recreational cycling paths are calculated using streetscape imagery and machine learning techniques. Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) and Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR) models are employed to identify significant streetscape indicators that impact cycling, and spatial heterogeneity in cycling route preferences is analyzed at different scales across street types. The results indicate that: (1) Recreational cyclists prefer mixed-use and scenic streets, particularly those along river corridors or within and around large green spaces. (2) Among the streetscape indicators, safety isolation degree has the most positive impact, followed by facility diversity, motorization level, and green view index, all of which positively influence cycling traffic to varying extents. Interface transparency and disorder negatively affect cycling, with transparency having the strongest influence. (3) In mixed-use, commercial, and life service streets, the effect of streetscape indicators on cycling route preferences varies by spatial location, exhibiting both promoting and inhibiting effects. In scenic streets, streetscape indicators show stronger positive or negative impacts, while in industrial streets, their influence is weaker. Based on these findings, the study proposes strategies for creating cycling-friendly environments tailored to different street types. The results validate and extend existing theories on the interaction between street environments and cycling behavior, offering valuable insights for diagnosing problems and implementing effective interventions to promote cycling-friendly environments, thus contributing to urban health, equity, and sustainable development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.