Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39953461›Full record

SynthesisBMC musculoskeletal disorders2025

The correlation between bone mineral density measured at the forearm and at the lumbar spine or femoral neck: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Mario Virgilio Papa, Chiara Ceolin, Cristina Simonato, Giulia Termini, Federica Vilona, Alessandro Ruggiero, Anna Bertocco, Chiara Curreri, Rocco Talomo, Alessandra Coin and 2 more

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Mario Virgilio PapaGeriatrics Division, Department of Medicine (DIMED), University of Padua, via Giustiniani 2, Padova, 35128, Italy.
Chiara CeolinGeriatrics Division, Department of Medicine (DIMED), University of Padua, via Giustiniani 2, Padova, 35128, Italy. chiara.ceolin.1@phd.unipd.it.
Cristina SimonatoGeriatrics Division, Department of Medicine (DIMED), University of Padua, via Giustiniani 2, Padova, 35128, Italy.
Giulia TerminiGeriatrics Division, Department of Medicine (DIMED), University of Padua, via Giustiniani 2, Padova, 35128, Italy.
Federica VilonaGeriatrics Division, Department of Medicine (DIMED), University of Padua, via Giustiniani 2, Padova, 35128, Italy.
Alessandro RuggieroResearch Unit of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Department of Medicine, Campus Bio-Medico University, Rome, Italy.
Anna BertoccoGeriatrics Division, Department of Medicine (DIMED), University of Padua, via Giustiniani 2, Padova, 35128, Italy.
Chiara CurreriGeriatrics Division, Department of Medicine (DIMED), University of Padua, via Giustiniani 2, Padova, 35128, Italy.
Rocco TalomoGeriatrics Division, Department of Medicine (DIMED), University of Padua, via Giustiniani 2, Padova, 35128, Italy.
Alessandra CoinGeriatrics Division, Department of Medicine (DIMED), University of Padua, via Giustiniani 2, Padova, 35128, Italy.
Giuseppe SergiGeriatrics Division, Department of Medicine (DIMED), University of Padua, via Giustiniani 2, Padova, 35128, Italy.
Marina De RuiGeriatrics Division, Department of Medicine (DIMED), University of Padua, via Giustiniani 2, Padova, 35128, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrent guidelines for osteoporosis diagnosis do not recommend forearm dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) as a standard tool, except in specific cases. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigates the potential correlation between forearm BMD and BMD at the lumbar and/or hip sites.

methodsThe protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024568756), and the study adhered to the PRISMA guidelines. Major databases were systematically searched from their inception until August 2024 to identify studies evaluating the ability of forearm DXA scans to detect osteoporosis, particularly in comparison to central sites like the femoral neck and lumbar spine. A meta-analysis was conducted on studies that reported correlation coefficients between these measurements. Quality assessment was conducted independently by 3 reviewers following Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) criteria. Additionally, a narrative synthesis of the main findings across different patient groups was performed.

resultsThirteen studies were included. Published between 1992 and 2023, these studies involved 5941 participants. Forearm scans exhibited strong correlations with lumbar and femoral sites (pooled effect size 0.603, 95%CI 0.579-0.627 and 0.641, 95%IC 0.600-0.680, respectively) demonstrating good predictive value for central osteoporosis. Despite some result variations, forearm DXA scanning emerged as a valid method, especially when lumbar and femoral measures are challenging.

conclusionsA DXA scan of the distal forearm proves to be a valuable supplementary tool for identifying osteoporotic conditions. This could be particularly relevant in older patients, where conducting lumbar or hip scans is often challenging or not feasible.

Indexed as

Absorptiometry, PhotonBone DensityFemur NeckForearmLumbar VertebraeOsteoporosisHumansBone mineral densityDensitometryForearmOlder adultsOsteoporosisT-score

Identifiers

PMID39953461
PMCPMC11827141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.