ArticleBMC public health2025
Rational drug use and the disposal cost of unused medications within house; a descriptive-cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products (PPCPs) disposal practices in Tokha, Nepal: a health belief model study.BMC public health · 2026Article
- What factors drive or hinder drugstores and residents from jointly recycling expired drugs? An evolutionary game analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- From medicine cabinets to ecosystems: a Europe-wide assessment of household pharmaceutical waste disposal practices.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Bibliometric Analysis and Review of Global Academic Research on Drug Take-Back Programs.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveAlthough irrational drug use is more common in underdeveloped and developing countries, it remains a significant health problem worldwide and is considered a habit that is difficult to correct. This study was conducted to determine individuals' attitudes toward rational drug use at the household level, the costs of unused drugs within households, and the methods of disposal used.
methodThe research is descriptive and cross-sectional and was conducted between March 1, 2022, and May 30, 2022. The study consists of families who reside in a district in the Black Sea region of Turkey. The research was carried out with 385 families, and data were collected through a questionnaire prepared by the researchers using face-to-face interviews. SPSS (25.0)soft ware package was used for data analysis.
resultsThe average age of the participants is 47.99 ± 17.81, with 66.8% of the participants being female. 52.5% of the participants use medication without consulting healthcare professionals when they are ill, 49.4% do not take their medication as prescribed, and 56.4% store medication at home. 28.1% of individuals do not check the expiration date of their medication, and 33.5% do not read the drug prospectus. Participants dispose of unused drugs by throwing them in the trash (36.6%) or storing them at home (36.4%). The cost of medication in households is 7,398 USD, and the cost of unused medication is 1,315 USD. The average cost of unused medication per households is calculated as 3.70 USD (112. 38 TL).
conclusionRational drug use is lower among those with lower education levels. Families dispose of unused drugs in inappropriate ways. 18% of the medication in households is unused, contributing to the burden on families and the national economy. Increasing public awareness of rational drug use and the sale of medications in smaller quantities at the box/bottle level can help prevent the accumulation ofmedication at home. Practical and sustainable solutions should be implemented for the disposal of unused drugs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.