Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39953447›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

An exploration of changes in the mental models of middle management and their association with activities to implement a dialogue tool to address mental health in the workplace.

Lily Joanne Anzion, Frederieke G Schaafsma, Cécile R L Boot, Margriet A G Formanoy, Roosmarijn M C Schelvis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lily Joanne AnzionDepartment of Public Health, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, University of Amsterdam, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. l.j.anzion@amsterdamumc.nl.
Frederieke G SchaafsmaDepartment of Public Health, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, University of Amsterdam, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Cécile R L BootDepartment of Public Health, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, University of Amsterdam, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Margriet A G FormanoyNetherlands Institute of Mental Health and Addiction, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Roosmarijn M C SchelvisDepartment of Public Health, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, University of Amsterdam, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

ZonMw 4745602
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is a growing awareness for addressing mental health in the workplace. Although interventions to promote mental health at the organizational-level exist, implementation is a challenge. Middle management can play a crucial role in implementing organisational-level interventions. Also, we know that mental models often need to change first, before enactment of such interventions occur. The aim of this study is therefore to better understand whether and how changes in mental models of middle managers are associated with the implementation activities of an organisational-level intervention to support mental health. Ultimately, this is meant to lead to the enactment of, in this case, a dialogue tool to normalize a conversation between middle manager and employee to enhance mental health.

methodsParticipatory Action Research was used as a method to design our implementation of a dialogue tool primarily focused on middle management to address mental in health in one SME company with 238 employees. In-depth interviews with 11 (middle) managers at the start of the implementation phase were held. After nine months, 9 out of the same 11 (middle) managers were interviewed again to gain understanding whether and how changes occurred during the implementation. Thematic analysis was applied to the interviews, from inductive and deductive perspective. Focus groups with employees and observations during the implementation activities were used for triangulation purposes.

resultsThe mental models of the (middle) managers were analyzed based on readiness for change, perceived challenges and perceived opportunities. These mental models were generally positive towards the project, despite the low trust towards the Top Management and the general lack of experience with addressing mental health at the workplace. Nine months later, mental models changed towards more awareness and engagement in addressing mental health. Also, enactment of the dialogue tool by middle management and employees occurred. An association of these changes with, for example, the frequency and pace of implementation activities in which all employees were involved was reported.

conclusionTo implement interventions addressing mental health at the workplace, taking the time and using implementation activities that match the needs of middle management might help to change mental models of (middle) management.

Indexed as

Health PromotionMental HealthModels, PsychologicalWorkplaceAdultFemaleFocus GroupsHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedOccupational HealthQualitative ResearchGroup-level sensemakingMental modelsMiddle-managementOrganisational-level mental health interventionParticipatory Action Research

Identifiers

PMID39953447
PMCPMC11829359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.