Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39953446›Full record

SynthesisBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025

Prevalence of negative birth experience: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Marzieh Bagherinia, Arezoo Haseli, Elham Bagherinia, Nasrin Mansouri, Mahrokh Dolatian, Zoherh Mahmoodi

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marzieh BagheriniaReproductive Health, Clinical Research Development Center, Motazedi Hospital, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.
Arezoo HaseliFamily Health and Population Growth Research Center, Health Policy and Promotion Institute, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran. ar_haseli@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1487-633X
Elham BagheriniaDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry, School of Medicine, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.
Nasrin MansouriObstetrics and Gynecology, Clinical Research Development Center, Motazedi Hospital, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.
Mahrokh DolatianMidwifery and Reproductive Health Research Center, Department of Midwifery and Reproductive Health, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Zoherh MahmoodiSocial Determinants of Health Research Center, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe overall experience women gain from the childbirth process is a significant outcome that is highly complex, subjective, and based on personal judgment. Cultural, social, and environmental contexts and societal policies can also influence it. The present systematic study and meta-analysis aim to conduct a comprehensive review to estimate the prevalence of negative childbirth experiences.

methodsPublished observational studies were reviewed without any time restrictions to conduct this systematic review. Relevant material was searched thoroughly in the PubMed/Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, ProQuest, and Google Scholar databases. Two authors independently evaluated the studies' quality using a modified Joanna Briggs checklists (JBI) version. Cochran's Q and I² tests were used to assess the heterogeneity of the studies. R software was used for the meta-analysis.

resultsThe study was based on a review of 19 observational studies published between 2001 and 2024 that examined the prevalence of negative childbirth experiences. The total sample size of the included studies was 73,353 women. Meta-analytic pooling of the prevalence of negative childbirth was 16% (95% CI: 10-22%). The evaluation of publication bias suggested a very strong likelihood of a small study effect due to the meta-analysis.

conclusionsBased on our study, the overall prevalence of negative childbirth experiences was calculated to be 16%. However, considering the short-term and long-term effects of this experience on various aspects of women's lives, greater attention should be paid to making pregnancy and childbirth more pleasant and to interventions to improve women's childbirth experiences.

Indexed as

Delivery, ObstetricParturitionFemaleHumansObservational Studies as TopicPregnancyPrevalenceChildbirthChildbirth experiencesPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID39953446
PMCPMC11827467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.