Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39953444›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2025

A diagnostic model for sepsis using an integrated machine learning framework approach and its therapeutic drug discovery.

Wuping Zhang, Hanping Shi, Jie Peng

RetractedAbstract readRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. FPR1-dependent Pro-inflammatory Ccl4Respiratory research · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Wuping ZhangJiangxi Provincial People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang Medical College, No.152 Aiguo Road, Nanchang, Jiangxi Province, 330006, China.
Hanping ShiJiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, 330031, China.
Jie PengJiangxi Provincial People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang Medical College, No.152 Aiguo Road, Nanchang, Jiangxi Province, 330006, China. pengjie@ncmc.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSepsis remains a life-threatening condition in intensive care units (ICU) with high morbidity and mortality rates. Some biomarkers commonly used in clinic do not have the characteristics of rapid and specific growth and rapid decline after effective treatment. Machine learning has shown great potential in early diagnosis, subtype analysis, accurate treatment and prognosis evaluation of sepsis.

methodsGene expression matrices from GSE13904 and GSE26440 were combined into a training model after quality control and standardization. Then, the intersection genes were obtained by crossing the screened differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and the module genes with the strongest correlation obtained by WGCNA analysis. 113 combined machine learning algorithms to build a diagnosis model. Then the CIBERSORT algorithm is used to analyze the relationship between the change of core gene expression and immune response in sepsis. Construct nomogram, DCA and CIC to further verify the reliability of the diagnosis model. The potential molecular compounds interacting with key genes were searched from the Traditional Chinese Medicine Active Compound Library (TCMACL).

resultsWe screened 405 DEGs, including 334 up-regulated and 71 down-regulated genes. The 308 potential genes were obtained by intersection of MEturquoise module genes in WGCNA analysis and DEGs for subsequent machine learning analysis. GO and KEGG enrichment analysis showed that sepsis was mainly related to immune response and bacterial infection. Then 113 combined machine learning algorithms are applied to construct a diagnosis model to screen 22 hub genes. Four four key genes (CD177, GNLY, ANKRD22, and IFIT1) are obtained through further analysis of PPI network constructed by 22 hub genes. Subsequently, the diagnostic model is proved to have good predictive value by nomogram, DCA and CIC. Finally, molecular compounds (Dieckol, Grosvenorine and Tellimagrandin II) were screened out as potential drugs.

conclusion113 combinated machine learning algorithms screened out four key genes that can distinguish sepsis patients. At the same time, potential therapeutic molecular compounds interacting with key genes genes were screened out by molecular docking.

Indexed as

Drug DiscoveryMachine LearningSepsisAlgorithmsBiomarkersGene Expression ProfilingGene Regulatory NetworksHumansNomogramsBiomarkersCIBERSORT analysisMachine learning algorithmsMolecular dockingSepsisWGCNA analysis

Identifiers

PMID39953444
PMCPMC11827343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.