Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39953431›Full record

ArticleBMC oral health2025

Effect of printing orientation and resin thickness on flexural strength of direct 3D-printed aligners.

Ahmed S Khalil, Abbas R Zaher

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ahmed S KhalilDepartment of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Champollion St, P.O. Box: 21521, Alexandria, Egypt. ahmedabuzeid62@gmail.com.
Abbas R ZaherDepartment of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Champollion St, P.O. Box: 21521, Alexandria, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDirect 3D-printed aligners served as a breakthrough era in clear aligner fabrication. Yet, there is a scarcity of studies evaluating their mechanical properties. The aim of this study was to compare direct 3D-printed aligners derived from different printing orientations (vertically, horizontally, 30, and 45 degrees) and thickness (0.5 and 0.7 mm) in terms of flexural strength.

methodsThis laboratory-based comparative study utilized 96 aligner flat specimens. They were designed, supported, and directly printed using shape memory resin, then randomly allocated into 8 groups. Group 1 (A, B, C, and D): 0.5 mm thickness printed vertically, horizontally, 30, and 45 degrees, respectively. Group 2 (A, B, C, and D): 0.7 mm thickness printed vertically, horizontally, 30, and 45 degrees, respectively. Each aligner specimen was placed on a custom-made bending jig, with the whole setup enclosed in a temperature-controlled water bath. Three-point bending test was performed using a universal testing machine, and the resulting force was recorded. Statistical analysis was performed using Student t-test for resin thickness comparison and one-way ANOVA with Tukey post-hoc test for comparison between printing orientations. Statistical significance was set at p ≤ 0.05.

resultsNo statistically significant differences were found between vertically, horizontally, 30, and 45 degrees printed aligner specimens. Aligner specimens of 0.7 mm thickness demonstrated significantly higher flexural strength values compared to those of 0.5 mm thickness.

conclusionsPrinting orientation did not alter the flexural strength of the direct 3D-printed aligner flat specimens, regardless of whether they were printed vertically, horizontally, or at angles of 30 or 45 degrees relative to the printer build plate. Additionally, specimens with a thickness of 0.7 mm exhibited higher bending resistance compared to those with a thickness of 0.5 mm.

Indexed as

Flexural StrengthOrthodontic Appliance DesignPrinting, Three-DimensionalDental Stress AnalysisHumansMaterials TestingClear alignersDirect printed alignersFlexural strengthMechanical propertiesPrinting orientation

Identifiers

PMID39953431
PMCPMC11829555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.