ArticleBMC geriatrics2025
The vulnerability of hip fracture patients with cognitive impairment: an analysis of health conditions, hospital care, and outcomes.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fecal and urinary incontinence in older men with hip fracture: a geriatric syndrome with prognostic significance.European geriatric medicine · 2026Article
- Acknowledging the Trauma and Connecting With the Human Spirit After Hip Fracture: A Qualitative Study.Nursing open · 2026Article
- Sensory processing impairments and their associations with physical and psychological outcomes in older adults after fall-related hip fracture surgery: a prospective cross-sectional study.BMC geriatrics · 2026Observational
- Management of hip fracture in older adults with cognitive impairment: a narrative review.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
- Article
- Fractured Neck of Femur Clinical Pathway Use in Tasmanian Emergency Departments: A Retrospective Study.Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA · 2025Article
- Unraveling the Bone-Brain Communication Network.Biology · 2025Review
- Does a Dual-Mobility Cup Offer Better Stability than Conventional Bearings in Hip Arthroplasty Following Femoral Neck Fracture?Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Outcome analysis after cephalomedullary nail implantation in older adults and elderly patients with per-, sub- or intertrochanteric femur fractures.BMC research notes · 2025Article
- Hip Fracture as a Systemic Disease in Older Adults: A Narrative Review on Multisystem Implications and Management.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Distal locking mechanism influences surgical and radiological outcomes in proximal femoral nailing using distal wedge versus distal screw designs.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Disparities in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Osteoporosis in Persons with Cognitive Impairment and Dementia.Current osteoporosis reports · 2025Review
- Disparities in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Osteoporosis in Persons with Cognitive Impairment and Dementia.Current osteoporosis reports · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCognitive impairment, including dementia, and hip fracture are both common among older patients. Both conditions are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Cognitive impairment is often underdiagnosed and may remain undetected in hip fracture patients. Little is known about the prevalence, specific characteristics, and outcomes of hip fracture patients with cognitive impairment. This analysis aimed to compare hip fracture patients with and without cognitive impairments regarding their health conditions, hospital care, and the risk of complications and mortality.
methodsThis study used data derived from the EMAAge project, a prospective multi-center cohort study conducted in Berlin, Germany. Patients aged 40 years and older with hip fracture were stratified into three cognitive status groups: no cognitive impairment (NCI), moderate cognitive impairment (MCI), and severe cognitive impairment (SCI). Categorization was based on patients' ability to engage in interviews and their performance on the 6-item Cognitive Impairment Test (6-CIT). Standardized mean differences were used to compare various health-related parameters and health care utilization measures. Regression models, both adjusted and unadjusted, were calculated for the number of complications and the mortality rate.
resultsCognitive impairment was present in 37% of the 310 hip fracture patients in the study cohort. Patients with cognitive impairment had a worse baseline health profile, delayed admission to the emergency department, a longer time to surgery, and were less likely to be referred to a rehabilitation program. In the adjusted regression model for the number of complications, the incidence rate ratio was 1.237 (p = 0.292) for MCI patients and 2.065 (p < 0.001) for SCI patients compared with NCI patients. The adjusted odds ratio for mortality was 1.046 (p = 0.942) for MCI patients and 2.875 (p = 0.060) for SCI patients.
conclusionsHip fracture patients with cognitive impairment, particularly severe impairment, arrive at the ED in a considerably poorer state of health and are at a higher risk of adverse outcomes, including complications and mortality. Timely identification of this at-risk group upon arrival appears to be essential to providing adequate care. This study highlights the need for interventions and research aimed at improving prevention, emergency care and outcomes for this vulnerable group, addressing their specific risk factors, and promoting the quality of care in hospital and after discharge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.