ArticleBMC psychiatry2025
Exploring the psychological effects of war on indirectly affected groups: a cross-sectional study on residents of Jordan.
Article in BMC psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mental health of palestinian undergraduates during the War on Gaza: a cross-sectional study on PTSD, CPTSD, and psychological distress.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Effect of Gaza war on the mental health of different generations in Egypt.BMC psychology · 2025Article
- Latent profiles of death anxiety among young adults: associations with self-esteem, security, and perceived social support.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Gaza War has significantly escalated conflict and humanitarian crises in the Gaza Strip, causing profound human suffering and psychological impact. This study investigates the mental health of residents of Jordan, examining anxiety and depression levels, sociodemographic factors, and resilience mechanisms to understand the psychological resilience of communities facing conflict-related stressors. This cross-sectional study used a convenience sampling method to collect data from Jordanian residents over 18 years of age. An online questionnaire shared on social media platforms was used, the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4) was used to measure anxiety and depression, the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) 4-item questionnaire was used to measure perceived stress, and the Brief Resilience Scale was used to measure population resilience. A total of 1,664 participants were included in the study. The mean stress score was reported as 8.72 (SD +/-2.342). Stress, anxiety, and depression were significantly associated with age and sex, with younger populations and female participants reporting higher stress scores. Among the sample, 65.0% of individuals displayed both anxiety and depression indicators, with 25.9% exhibiting severe, 66.4% exhibiting moderate and 33.6% exhibiting mild level. A comprehensive, multi-institutional approach is needed to increase awareness and screening of mental health conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.