Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39953400›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of emergency medicine2025

Development of an emergency department triage tool to predict admission or discharge for older adults.

Ashraf Abugroun, Saria Awadalla, Sanjay Singh, Margaret C Fang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Assessment of Sydney Triage to Admission Risk Tool (START) on Egyptian Emergency Department performance.African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ashraf AbugrounDivision of Hospital Medicine, University of California, 505 Parnassus Ave, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA. Ashraf.abugroun@ucsf.edu.
Saria AwadallaDivision of Biostatistics, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Sanjay SinghDepartment of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Margaret C FangDivision of Hospital Medicine, University of California, 505 Parnassus Ave, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.

Funding

VARC CoreP30AG044281 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Louise C. Walter · 2013 to 2026
$19.9M
Use and outcomes of anticoagulants for the treatment and prevention of thrombosis among hospitalized patientsK24HL141354 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI FANG, MARGARET C. · 2018 to 2022
$731k
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health K24HL141354NHLBI NIH HHS K24 HL141354NIA NIH HHS P30 AG044281
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOlder adults present to Emergency Departments (ED) with complex conditions, requiring triage models that support effective disposition decisions. While existing models perform well in the general population, they often fall short for older patients. This study introduces a triage model aimed at improving early risk stratification and disposition planning in this population.

methodsWe analyzed the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey data (2015-2019) for ED patients aged ≥ 60 years, excluding those who died in the ED or left against medical advice. Key predictors were identified using a two-step process combining LASSO and backward stepwise selection. Model performance was evaluated using AUC and calibration plots, while clinical utility was assessed through decision curve analysis. Risk thresholds (< 0.1, 0.1-0.5, > 0.5) stratified patients into low, moderate, and high-risk groups, optimizing the balance between sensitivity and specificity.

resultsOf 13,431 patients, 3,180 (23.7%) were admitted. Key predictors for admission included ambulance arrival, chronic conditions, gastrointestinal bleeding, and abnormal vital signs. The model showed strong discrimination (AUC 0.73) and good calibration, validated by 10-fold cross-validation (mean AUC 0.73, SD 0.02). Decision curve analysis highlighted net benefit across clinically relevant thresholds. At thresholds of 0.1 and 0.5, the model identified 18.9% as low-risk (91.2% accuracy) and 7.9% as high-risk (57.7%). Adjusting thresholds to 0.2 and 0.4 expanded low-risk (55.4%, 87.9% accuracy) and high-risk (14.1%, 53.7% accuracy) groups.

conclusionsThis older adult-focused risk score uses readily available data to enhance early discharge, prioritize admissions for high-risk patients, and enhance ED care delivery.

Indexed as

Emergency departmentHospitalizationOlder adultsRisk score

Identifiers

PMID39953400
PMCPMC11827304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.