ArticleBMC medical imaging2025
A nomogram for diagnosis of BI-RADS 4 breast nodules based on three-dimensional volume ultrasound.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhancing diagnostic precision for BI-RADS 4a breast nodules: A multimodal AI model integrating ultrasound radiomics, hemodynamic signatures, and clinical profiles.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
- "Cloud sign" in automated breast volume scanning coronal images for the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Development and validation of a screening model for benign and malignant breast masses based on S-Detect and microvascular flow imaging.Gland surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThe classification of malignant breast nodules into four categories according to the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) presents significant variability, posing challenges in clinical diagnosis. This study investigates whether a nomogram prediction model incorporating automated breast ultrasound system (ABUS) can improve the accuracy of differentiating benign and malignant BI-RADS 4 breast nodules.
methodsData were collected for a total of 257 nodules with breast nodules corresponding to BI-RADS 4 who underwent ABUS examination and for whom pathology results were obtained from January 2019 to August 2022. The participants were divided into a benign group (188 cases) and a malignant group (69 cases) using a retrospective study method. Ultrasound imaging features were recorded. Logistic regression analysis was used to screen the clinical and ultrasound characteristics. Using the results of these analyses, a nomogram prediction model was established accordingly.
resultsAge, distance between nodule and nipple, calcification and C-plane convergence sign were independent risk factors that enabled differentiation between benign and malignant breast nodules (all P < 0.05). A nomogram model was established based on these variables. The area under curve (AUC) values for the nomogram model, age, distance between nodule and nipple, calcification, and C-plane convergence sign were 0.86, 0.735, 0.645, 0.697, and 0.685, respectively. Thus, the AUC value for the model was significantly higher than a single variable.
conclusionsA nomogram based on the clinical and ultrasound imaging features of ABUS can be used to improve the accuracy of the diagnosis of benign and malignant BI-RADS 4 nodules. It can function as a relatively accurate predictive tool for sonographers and clinicians and is therefore clinically useful. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE STATEMENT: we retrospectively analyzed the clinical and ultrasound characteristics of ABUS BI-RADS 4 nodules and established a nomogram model to improve the efficiency of the majority of ABUS readers in the diagnosis of BI-RADS 4 nodules.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.