ArticleBMC geriatrics2025
Adaptation of LASA sedentary behaviour questionnaire into Turkish and examination of its psychometric properties in elderly individuals.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Assessment Tools, Interventions, and Biopsychosocial Factors Associated With Physical Activity in Older Adults: A Scoping Review.Nursing research and practice · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study was conducted to adapt the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam Sedentary Behavior Questionnaire (LASA-SBQ) into Turkish. Turkish translation, validity and reliability studies were performed. MATERIALS AND
methodsA total of 100 volunteers (50 female), aged 65 years and over (median age: 71.00), with a score of 23 for educated and 19 or above for uneducated, on the Mini Mental State Examination and the Barthel Index score of 61 or above were included in the study. Sociodemographic data of the participants were recorded with the evaluation form. LASA-SBQ, the Sedentary Behavior Questionnaire (SBQ), Epworth Sleepiness Scale and International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Form were applied. SPSS 26.00 software was used for statistical analyses. P < 0.05 was accepted as statistical significance level. Cultural adaptation of the questionnaire was performed in accordance with the Beaton protocol. After the translation of the questionnaire, its psychometric properties were examined and validity and reliability analyses were performed.
resultsThe mean time spent by the participants as sedentary in a week was 9.390 ± 3.733 h. There was a correlation between the LASA-SBQ and the total score of the SBQ (Pearson r = 0.757; p < 0.01). The test-retest reliability of the LASA-SBQ was examined and the intraclass correlation coefficient was found to be 0.978. In order to examine the validity of the questionnaire together with the SBQ, Bland-Altman analysis was performed and a graph was drawn. Bland-Altman analysis shows that the validity of the questionnaire is high. CONCLUSION-DISCUSSION: The LASA-SBQ was translated into Turkish and culturally adapted. The psychometric properties of the questionnaire were examined and validity and reliability analyses were performed. The Turkish version of the LASA-SBQ is a valid and reliable scale and is suitable for use in scientific research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.