ArticleClinical journal of gastroenterology2025
Ascending colon perforation by a migrated pancreatic spontaneous dislodgment stent: a case report.
Article in Clinical journal of gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Concealed Peritonitis Due to Stomach Perforation from a Fish Otolith: A Case Report.Reports (MDPI) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Here, we report a case of a 74-year-old woman treated for acute cholecystitis. She initially underwent percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage; however, cholecystitis recurred when the drain was clamped. Therefore, endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage (ETGBD) was performed. Endoscopic sphincterotomy was performed, and a transpapillary gallbladder stent was placed. Additionally, a pancreatic spontaneous dislodgment stent (PSDS) was inserted to prevent post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis. Cholecystitis resolved, and the patient was discharged seven days later. Twenty-five days after ETGBD, she experienced abdominal pain, and computed tomography revealed ascending colon perforation by the migrated PSDS. She underwent laparoscopic surgery, in which the perforation was sutured, and an ileostomy was performed. The postoperative course was uneventful, and colonoscopy performed two months after surgery revealed multiple diverticula in the ascending colon. PSDS-induced gastrointestinal perforations are extremely rare. Previous case reports have suggested that perforation is caused by long-term stent retention in the gastrointestinal tract due to obstructions, such as peritonitis carcinomatosa or postoperative adhesions. We believe that in this case, the PSDS was retained because of multiple colonic diverticula. PSDS should be used with caution in patients with multiple colonic diverticula, peritonitis carcinomatosa, and postoperative adhesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39953361What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.