ArticleClinical oral investigations2025
Gingival phenotype prevalence of lower incisors and associated risk indicators in the French dental student population: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05813444 (Gingival Phenotype Prevalence of Lower Incisors and Associated Risk Factors in French Dental Students Population), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Gingival Phenotype Prevalence of Lower Incisors and Associated Risk Factors in French Dental Students Population : a Cross-sectional Study
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Gingival Phenotype and Associated Factors in Orthodontically Treated Individuals and Untreated Controls: A Cross-Sectional Comparative Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo investigate the prevalence of the gingival phenotype in the mandibular incisor area and the associated risk indicators. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis cross-sectional study involved clinical examination to record main periodontal characteristics (gingival phenotypes) at the tooth level. Then, a phenotype at the subject level was defined as fragile (at least one thin phenotype on one of the four incisors) versus resistant (no thin phenotype on the four incisors). Furthermore, orthodontic parameters were assessed based on photographic examination. Two blinded periodontists and two blinded orthodontists were involved in the data collection. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were implemented.
resultsA total of 119 students were included, encompassing 476 incisors. The prevalence of gingival phenotypes at the tooth level was as follows: thin/high (63.9%), thick/high (36.3%), thin/reduced (5.9%), and thick/reduced (0.2%). At the subject level, the fragile phenotype predominated (81.5%) and showed a significant correlation with the visibility of roots prominence (OR = 4.09, 95% CI: 1.47-11.41, p = 0.007).
conclusionsConsidering the conditions of this study, in the mandibular incisor area, the thin/high gingival phenotype exhibited the highest prevalence at the tooth level. At the subject level, the presence of visible roots prominence was identified as the only significant risk indicator associated with the fragile phenotype. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: General practitioners, periodontists and orthodontists should consider the mandibular incisor sector as a vulnerable area. Categorizing the overall gingival phénotype into 4 types improves the diagnostic approach and allows better identification of high-risk phenotypes, especially in cases requiring multidisciplinary management. CLINICALTRIAL: GOV RECORD: Number NCT05813444.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39953292What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.