Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39953279›Full record

ArticleCalcified tissue international2025

Basic and Clinical Scientists Working Together-Do We Make the Best of Both Worlds?

Willem F Lems, Athanasios D Anastasilakis, Christina Møller Andreasen, Julien Paccou, Tim Rolvien, Michaela Tencerova, Jan Tuckermann, Maria P Yavropoulou, Kent Søe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Calcified tissue international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Willem F LemsDepartment of Rheumatology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6885-3953
Athanasios D AnastasilakisDepartment of Endocrinology, 424 Military General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-9624-6296
Christina Møller AndreasenPathology Research Unit, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230, Odense M, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-2624-5677
Julien PaccouMABlab ULR 4490, Rheumatology Department, University of Lille, CHU Lille, F-59000, Lille, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6599-8623
Tim RolvienDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Division of Orthopaedics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1058-1307
Michaela TencerovaLaboratory of Molecular Physiology of Bone, Institute of Physiology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague 4, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-8670-425X
Jan TuckermannInstitute of Comparative Molecular Endocrinology (CME), Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3691-275X
Maria P YavropoulouFirst Department of Propaedeutic and Internal Medicine, Endocrinology Unit, LAIKO University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-6501-3692
Kent SøePathology Research Unit, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230, Odense M, Denmark. kent.soee@rsyd.dk.ORCID 0000-0001-7402-314X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Musculoskeletal disorders, affecting as many as 1.3 billion people worldwide, are the leading cause of disability and impose a substantial health and socioeconomic burden. Despite the high prevalence of these conditions, translational research in this field is far from optimal, highlighting the need for stronger collaboration between basic and clinical scientists. This paper, authored by members of the basic and clinical action groups of the European Calcified Tissue Society (ECTS) and endorsed by the Board of the ECTS, examines the key barriers to effective translational research in musculoskeletal diseases, including clinician workload, differences in professional language and culture, physical distance between research sites, and insufficient interdisciplinary funding. Through interviews with eight institutional managers across five European countries, we observed that in some institutions, the collaboration between basic scientists and clinicians was regarded as no concern (but with room for improvement), and in most institutions it was recognised as a serious issue. We found consensus on the importance of collaboration yet identified discrepancies in the provision of structural and financial support. Based on these findings, we propose strategic initiatives to bridge the gap between basic and clinical research. Suggested measures include dedicated translational funding, integrated research facilities, collaborative scientific forums, strategic collaborations, establishment of physician-scientists, and, finally, bringing basic and clinical researchers together in the same building or even in a combined department. Notable successes, such as the development of the anti-osteoporotic drugs, romosozumab and denosumab, underscore the value of a coordinated approach and exemplify how shared insights between laboratory research and clinical practice can lead to impactful therapeutic advances. Moving forward, we advocate for institutional commitments to foster a robust translational research environment, as well as tailored funding initiatives to support such efforts. This paper serves as a call for discussion and action to enhance interdisciplinary cooperation to advance musculoskeletal medicine and improve outcomes for patients with debilitating musculoskeletal diseases.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchMusculoskeletal DiseasesResearch PersonnelTranslational Research, BiomedicalCooperative BehaviorEuropeHumansBarriersBasic scientistClinical scientistCultureOrganisationSystems medicine

Identifiers

PMID39953279
PMCPMC11828806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.