ArticleDiscover nano2025
Influence of fiber dimensions on the mechanical properties of silica glass nanofibers.
Article in Discover nano, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The understanding of the mechanical properties in glass nanofibers remains a challenge. As the fiber diameter decreases, surface-to-volume atom fraction increases, making the impact of surface defects more significant. To elucidate these effects, we employed classical molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to investigate how fiber dimensions and the surface layer influence the mechanical properties of silica glass nanofibers. Our simulation methodology included fibers of varying diameters, generated using two different production methods (i.e. "cutting" and "casting" methods) that produce different degrees of surface atomic defects, and compared with bulk samples without surface atoms. The defect-rich surface layer of these fibers was carefully analyzed. Then, MD tensile simulations were performed to analyze the effect of the fiber surface on the mechanical properties and to explain the onset of the brittle-to-ductile transition experimentally observed at a few tens of nanometers. The results revealed that the surface layer maintains a fixed thickness independent of the fiber diameter, resulting in a pronounced increase of the fiber defects in thin fibers. Also, the tensile test simulations show that surface defects significantly reduce tensile strength, without appreciably increasing ductility compared to bulk samples. In turn, we show that the brittle-to-ductile transition is not caused by the surface defects, but related to a balance between fracture energy and elastic energy, which varies with fiber length. Using experimental values of different glass properties, our theory predicted a threshold length of around 200 nm, below which ductile fracture dominates, in reasonable agreement with experimental results.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.