Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39953215›Full record

ArticleLasers in medical science2025

Laser versus rhomboid flap for sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus: multi-centre comparative study.

Alaa Alwadees, Abdulzahra Hussain, Emad Geddoa, Ali Younus Altamimi, Tamer Habeeb, Sahl Jafer, Samer Al-Hakkak

Erratum issuedAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Lasers in medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alaa AlwadeesUniversity of Jabir Ibn Hayyan, Kufa, Iraq.
Abdulzahra HussainUniversity of Alkafeel, Najaf, Iraq. azahrahussain@yahoo.com.
Emad GeddoaUniversity of Alameed, Karbala, Iraq.
Ali Younus AltamimiAlkadhimya Private Hospital, Baghdad, Iraq.
Tamer HabeebZagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.
Sahl JaferUniversity of Jabir Ibn Hayyan, Kufa, Iraq.
Samer Al-HakkakUniversity of Alkafeel, Najaf, Iraq.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pilonidal sinus is a condition affecting young people. Several management methods are available. The two popular approaches are laser ablation and open techniques. This study aims to assess the recurrence rate after both techniques. This is a government and private hospital setting. Patients are included if they are diagnosed with pilonidal sinus, between the ages of 16 and 70, and have never had surgery before. Diabetic patients and patients with immune deficiency status who are younger than 16 or older than 70 are excluded. The operations are done by senior consultant surgeons. Patients are seen for 4 weeks or 3 months and discharged if there are no complications. 190 and 184 patients were selected for the laser and open groups, respectively. There are 142 men and 42 women in the open group compared to 140 men and 50 women in the laser group, with p-value: of 0.472. There was no significant difference in age, body mass index, or obesity between the two groups. There is a significantly higher recurrence rate in the laser group value: <0.00001. No significant difference in the recurrence rate for one or more than one opening disease within the open group. The laser technique is associated with a higher recurrence rate compared to the open rhomboid flap technique. One opening pilonidal sinus is significantly showing better results within the laser group but no significant difference in the open group.

Indexed as

Laser TherapyPilonidal SinusSurgical FlapsAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRecurrenceSacrococcygeal RegionTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultLaser ablationOpen surgeryReconstruction rhomboid flapRecurrenceSinus laser closure (SiLaC)

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.