ArticleEuropean radiology2025
Predicting progression-free survival using dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging-based radiomics in advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients treated with nimotuzumab.
Article in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe purpose of this study was to explore the potential value of the radiomics model based on dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI), compared with the clinical model mostly based on the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression, in predicting progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC) treated with nimotuzumab (NTZ).
methodsA total of 136 patients with LA-NPC who received NTZ treatment between January 2018 and June 2022 were included in this study. Patients were randomly divided into training (n = 95) and validation (n = 41) groups in a 7:3 ratio. DCE-MRI radiomics, clinical, and clinical-radiomics models were built to predict PFS. The relationship between EGFR expression levels and NTZ efficacy was assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves. Model performance was assessed using the area under the curve, calibration, and DeLong tests. Decision curve analysis evaluated net clinical benefit. Patients were stratified into high- and low-risk groups based on optimal model radiomic scores, and prognoses were compared using Kaplan-Meier curves.
resultsUnivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that EGFR expression level was the only independent predictive factor of PFS (p < 0.05). Patients with EGFR 3+ receiving NTZ therapy had significantly longer PFS than those with EGFR 1+ (hazard ratio = 3.025, p < 0.05). The clinical-radiomics model exhibited superior predictive efficacy, compared with the radiomics and clinical models (training set: 0.887 vs. 0.845, 0.654; validation set: 0.831, 0.824 vs. 0.567, all p < 0.001).
conclusionsThe clinical-radiomics models using DCE-MRI and EGFR levels can effectively predict NTZ efficacy in LA-NPC patients, providing objective evidence for personalized treatment adjustments. KEY POINTS: Question How can the response to nimotuzumab treatment in patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma be accurately predicted using non-invasive imaging methods? Findings A combined clinical and radiomic model using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging showed improved predictive performance for progression-free survival in patients treated with nimotuzumab. Clinical relevance The study provides evidence for using a combined clinical and radiomic approach, offering a non-invasive method to predict treatment response and guide personalized treatment strategies for patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma, potentially improving patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39953153What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.