Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39953150›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2025

Retrieval-augmented generation improves precision and trust of a GPT-4 model for emergency radiology diagnosis and classification: a proof-of-concept study.

Anna Fink, Johanna Nattenmüller, Stephan Rau, Alexander Rau, Hien Tran, Fabian Bamberg, Marco Reisert, Elmar Kotter, Thierno Diallo, Maximilian F Russe

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. [Before the examination: digital check-in].Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Anna FinkDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Center University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany. anna.fink@uniklinik-freiburg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-9903-283X
Johanna NattenmüllerDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Center University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Stephan RauDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Center University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Alexander RauDepartment of Neuroradiology, Medical Center University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Hien TranDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Center University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Fabian BambergDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Center University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Marco ReisertDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Center University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Elmar KotterDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Center University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Thierno Diallo *Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Center University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Maximilian F Russe *Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Center University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study evaluated the effect of enhancing a GPT-4 model with retrieval-augmented generation on its ability to diagnose and classify traumatic injuries based on radiology reports. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this prospective proof-of-concept study, we used retrieval-augmented generation as a zero-shot learning approach to provide expert knowledge from the RadioGraphics top ten reading list for trauma radiology to the GPT-4 model, creating the context-aware TraumaCB. Radiological report findings of 50 traumatic injuries were independently generated by two radiologists. The performance of the TraumaCB compared to the generic GPT-4 was evaluated by three board-certified radiologists, assessing the accuracy and trustworthiness of the chatbot responses in the 100 reports created.

resultsThe TraumaCB achieved 100% correct diagnoses, 96% correct classification, and 87% correct grading, outperforming the generic GPT-4 with 93% correct diagnoses, 70% correct classification, and 48% correct grading. TraumaCB sources consistently achieved a median rating of 5.0 for explanation and trust. Challenges encountered mainly involved traumatic injuries lacking widely accepted classification systems.

conclusionAugmenting a commercial GPT-4 model with retrieval-augmented generation improves its diagnostic and classification capabilities, positioning it as a valuable tool for efficiently assessing traumatic injuries across various anatomical regions in trauma radiology. KEY POINTS: Question Retrieval-augmented generation has the potential to enhance generic chatbots with task-specific knowledge of emergency radiology. Findings The TraumaCB excelled in accuracy, particularly in injury classification and grading, and provided explanations along with the sources used, increasing transparency and facilitating verification. Clinical relevance The TraumaCB provides accurate, fast, and transparent access to trauma radiology classifications, potentially increasing the efficiency of image interpretation in emergency departments and enabling customized reports based on local or individual preferences.

Indexed as

Generative Artificial IntelligenceRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedRadiology Information SystemsWounds and InjuriesDatasets as TopicEmergency Service, HospitalHumansProof of Concept StudyArtificial intelligenceDeep learningEmergency medicineNatural language processingTomography

Identifiers

PMID39953150
PMCPMC12226682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.