ArticleScientific reports2025
Integrating angio-IMR and CMR-assessed microvascular obstruction for improved risk stratification of STEMI patients.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimizing Extracellular Vesicles for Cardiac Repair Post-Myocardial Infarction: Approaches and Challenges.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- A predictive nomogram for intramyocardial hemorrhage in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention based on coronary angiography-derived index of microcirculatory resistance.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Article
- Molecular Mechanisms of Microvascular Obstruction and Dysfunction in Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: From Pathophysiology to Therapeutics-A Comprehensive Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Early detection of coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), is challenging. The index of microcirculatory resistance (caIMR), derived from computational pressure-fluid dynamics (CPFD), allows practical assessment of CMD using only routine coronary angiography. However, the prognostic implications of combining caIMR with microvascular obstruction (MVO) identified through cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging are unclear. This retrospective study investigates the utility of CPFD-caIMR and CMR-derived MVO in predicting major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) in 292 STEMI patients who underwent primary PCI, followed by caIMR and CMR evaluations. Patients were stratified into four groups based on caIMR thresholds (≤ 40 U or > 40 U) and the presence/absence of MVO. The primary endpoint was MACEs, defined as cardiac death, recurrent myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, or heart failure readmission. Overall, 101/292 patient exhibited discordant caIMR and MVO results. Specifically, 103 patients had caIMR ≤ 40 U without MVO, while 88 patients showed caIMR > 40 U with MVO. Multivariate analysis identified both caIMR > 40 U and MVO as independent predictors of MACEs, with an HR of 3.572 for each unit increase in CPFD-caIMR > 40 U. Combination of CPFD-caIMR and MVO significantly enhanced predictive accuracy. CPFD-caIMR is a reliable, minimally invasive tool for identifying microvascular dysfunction. Combination with CMR-derived MVO improves risk stratification in STEMI patients following PCI, holding promise for the early identification of high-risk patients, enabling targeted and personalized management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.