ArticleCommunications engineering2025
Vision-based tactile sensor design using physically based rendering.
Article in Communications engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- In Vivo Skin 3-D Surface Reconstruction and Wrinkle Depth Estimation Using Handheld High Resolution Tactile Sensing.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Article
- Editors' Choice 2025.Communications engineering · 2026Article
- System-Level Design and Integration of Dexterous Robotic Hands for Complex Manipulation.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Review
- SimTac: A Physics-Based Simulator for Vision-Based Tactile Sensing with Biomorphic Structures.Cyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Article
- Influence of Material Optical Properties in Direct ToF LiDAR Optical Tactile Sensing: Comprehensive Evaluation.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- From Sensors to Care: How Robotic Skin Is Transforming Modern Healthcare-A Mini Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
High-resolution tactile sensors are very helpful to robots for fine-grained perception and manipulation tasks, but designing those sensors is challenging. This is because the designs are based on the compact integration of multiple optical elements, and it is difficult to understand the correlation between the element arrangements and the sensor accuracy by trial and error. In this work, we introduce the digital design of vision-based tactile sensors using a physically accurate light simulator. The framework modularizes the design process, parameterizes the sensor components, and contains an evaluation metric to quantify a sensor's performance. We quantify the effects of sensor shape, illumination setting, and sensing surface material on tactile sensor performance using our evaluation metric. The proposed optical simulation framework can replicate the tactile image of the real vision-based tactile sensor prototype without any prior sensor-specific data. Using our approach we can substantially improve the design of a fingertip GelSight sensor. This improved design performs approximately 5 times better than previous state-of-the-art human-expert design at real-world robotic tactile embossed text detection. Our simulation approach can be used with any vision-based tactile sensor to produce a physically accurate tactile image. Overall, our approach enables the automatic design of sensorized soft robots and opens the door for closed-loop co-optimization of controllers and sensors for dexterous manipulation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.