ArticleScientific reports2025
A parallel texture-based region-growing algorithm implemented in OpenMP.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Three-Dimensional Phenotype Extraction Method Based on Point Cloud Segmentation for All-Period Cotton Multiple Organs.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We introduce an innovative OpenMP design and implementation of a search-growing algorithm for fine-grained lock-based parallelization, which enhances automatic volume extraction in seismic data represented by 3D voxel pictures to detect salt bodies and assess the voxel texture. The first algorithm was developed in MATLAB, subsequently translated to Fortran, and ultimately enhanced with OpenMP pragmas to facilitate the parallel version. In the parallel version, synchronization techniques are essential to enforce limits on the sequence of voxel analysis conducted by the threads. To do this, we employed OpenMP locks to ensure that only a single thread can process one voxel, hence maintaining the coherence of the data. Minimizing crucial regions in parallel programming is advisable as they might hinder scalability and performance. In this application, locks do not induce latency since not all threads attempt to access the same voxel, indicating that not all threads traverse the same critical region. Our design involves securing each voxel that may adapt to the 3D image, enhancing performance and markedly decreasing execution time. Performance trials were conducted on a dual Xeon system featuring twenty physical cores, with Hyperthreading (HT) both disabled and enabled. In this investigation, HT improved slightly the performance.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.