Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39953088›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A comprehensive analysis of the impacts of Image Resolution and Scanning Times on the quality of MPI-reconstructed images.

Ton Duc Do, Azamat Mukhatov, Aizhan Tolebay, Tuan-Anh Le, Tri T Pham

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ton Duc Do *Department of Robotics, School of Engineering and Digital Sciences (SEDS), Nazarbayev University, Astana, 010000, Kazakhstan. doduc.ton@nu.edu.kz.
Azamat MukhatovDepartment of Robotics, School of Engineering and Digital Sciences (SEDS), Nazarbayev University, Astana, 010000, Kazakhstan.
Aizhan TolebayDepartment of Biology, School of Sciences, Humanities Nazarbayev University, Astana, 010000, Kazakhstan.
Tuan-Anh LeDepartment of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, 85259, USA.
Tri T PhamDepartment of Biology, School of Sciences, Humanities Nazarbayev University, Astana, 010000, Kazakhstan. tri.pham@nu.edu.kz.

Funding

Ministry of Science and Higher Education of Kazakhstan AP22787355
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Scanning trajectories are essential and important components of trajectory-based scanning and imaging systems such as laser scanning confocal microscopes, atomic force microscopes (AFM), laser scanning systems for aerial surveying (LiDAR), micro-electromechanical systems (MEMS), medical imaging and 2D/3D printing. Previous study has demonstrated that Sinusoidal Lissajous is the optimal scanning trajectory and proposed that increasing the scanning repetition could further enhance image quality. However, it is challenging to pinpoint the essential elements needed to enhance the quality of the reconstructed images since there is currently no comprehensive analysis of how the scanning trajectory resolution and scanning time affect the reconstructed image quality. The purpose of this work is to look into the influence of scanning resolution and scanning time on the quality of magnetic particle imaging (MPI)-reconstructed images across a variety of scanning trajectories. This study offers a comprehensive analysis of how scanning repetition and scanning time affect the reconstructed images' quality at the individual pixel in the field of view (FOV) as well as throughout the entire FOV. The impacts of the scanning time were investigated both before and after image reconstruction. In the pre-reconstruction phase, the minimum and maximum distances to the closest neighboring points in the FOV and their distribution in different regions of the FOV were analyzed in order to investigate the density, homogeneity, and time spent on each pixel. Here, we demonstrated that the image resolution for any scanning trajectory is scale invariance, meaning that for a fixed frequency ratio [Formula: see text], the ratio of pixel size to image FOV size remains constant. Peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), structural similarity index measure (SSIM), normalized root mean square error (NRMSE), and normalized sum of squared error (NSSE) are used to evaluate and compare the reconstructed images' quality in the post-reconstruction stage. It is found that the Sinusoidal Lissajous scanning trajectory is the best in terms of accuracy, structural similarity, and signal-to-noise. We showed that only the image quality for bidirectional Cartesian and sinusoidal Lissajous trajectories are sensitive to scanning time, particularly at the pixel scale. Furthermore, contrary to expectations, we discovered that optimizing the scanning repetition did not enhance the MPI-reconstructed image quality. Nevertheless, the image quality would be enhanced by extending the scanning duration through decreasing the scanning frequency. The optimal scanning frequency is half of the frequently used 25 kHz for the chosen [Formula: see text] ratio of 100.

Indexed as

Optimal scanning frequencyScale invarianceScanning repetitionScanning timeScanning trajectory resolution

Identifiers

PMID39953088
PMCPMC11828862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.