ArticleScientific reports2025
Ontology-guided machine learning outperforms zero-shot foundation models for cardiac ultrasound text reports.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- OntoCodex: a multi-agent biomedical ontology enrichment framework.npj health systems · 2026Article
- Evaluating Chain-of-Thought reasoning in large language models for thyroid ultrasound interpretation: a dual-information approach.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Article
- Sensitivity and Specificity of Natural Language Processing Systems for Identification of Hospitalized People Who Use Drugs.Open forum infectious diseases · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Big data can revolutionize research and quality improvement for cardiac ultrasound. Text reports are a critical part of such analyses. Cardiac ultrasound reports include structured and free text and vary across institutions, hampering attempts to mine text for useful insights. Natural language processing (NLP) can help and includes both statistical- and large language model based techniques. We tested whether we could use NLP to map cardiac ultrasound text to a three-level hierarchical ontology. We used statistical machine learning (EchoMap) and zero-shot inference using GPT. We tested eight datasets from 24 different institutions and compared both methods against clinician-scored ground truth. Despite all adhering to clinical guidelines, institutions differed in their structured reporting. EchoMap performed best with validation accuracy of 98% for the first ontology level, 93% for first and second levels, and 79% for all three. EchoMap retained performance across external test datasets and could extrapolate to examples not included in training. EchoMap's accuracy was comparable to zero-shot GPT at the first level of the ontology and outperformed GPT at second and third levels. We show that statistical machine learning can map text to structured ontology and may be especially useful for small, specialized text datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.