ArticleScientific reports2025
Developing a nomogram model for predicting non-obstructive azoospermia using machine learning techniques.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biological and clinical factors predicting sperm retrieval success in men with non-obstructive azoospermia.Reproduction & fertility · 2026Review
- Review
- Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting sperm retrieval success in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia undergoing testicular sperm aspiration.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Azoospermia, defined by the absence of sperm in the ejaculate, manifests as obstructive azoospermia (OA) or non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA). Reliable predictive models utilizing biomarkers could aid in clinical decision-making. This study included 352 azoospermia patients, with 152 diagnosed with OA and 200 with NOA. The data were randomly divided into a training set (244 cases) and a validation set (108 cases) for machine learning analysis. The training set was utilized for univariate and multivariate logistic regression to identify key predictors of NOA. Following this, nine machine learning. This study included 352 azoospermia patients, with 152 diagnosed with OA and 200 with NOA. The data were randomly divided into a training set (244 cases) and a validation set (108 cases) for machine learning analysis. The training set was utilized for univariate and multivariate logistic regression to identify key predictors of NOA. Following this, nine machine learning methods were employed to refine the prediction model. A novel nomogram model was developed, and its predictive performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curves, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses identified semen pH and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) as positive predictors of NOA, while mean testicular volume (MTV) and inhibin B (INHB) were negatively correlated with NOA. Among nine machine learning methods evaluated, the Gradient Boosting Decision Trees achieved the highest performance with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.974, whereas Random Forest showed the lowest AUC at 0.953. The nomogram model, incorporating these four factors, demonstrated robust predictive performance with AUCs of 0.984 in the training set and 0.976 in the validation set. Calibration and decision curve analysis confirmed the model's accuracy and clinical utility. Optimal cut-off points for biomarkers were identified: FSH at 7.50 IU/L (AUC = 0.96), INHB at 43.45 pg/ml (AUC = 0.95), MTV at 9.92 ml (AUC = 0.91), and semen pH at 6.95 (AUC = 0.71). The novel nomogram model incorporating FSH, INHB, MTV, and pH effectively predicts NOA in patients. This model offers a valuable tool for personalized diagnosis and management of azoospermia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.