ArticleScientific reports2025
Transformer-based heart language model with electrocardiogram annotations.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Wearable Flexible Sensors for Cardiovascular Disease Monitoring.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026Review
- An explainable deep learning framework for trustworthy arrhythmia detection from ECG signals.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Risk stratification and survival prediction in heart failure: from grades to scores.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This paper explores the potential of transformer-based foundation models to detect Atrial Fibrillation (AFIB) in electrocardiogram (ECG) processing, an arrhythmia specified as an irregular heart rhythm without patterns. We construct a language with tokens from heartbeat locations to detect irregular heart rhythms by applying a transformers-based neural network architecture previously used only for building natural language models. Our experiments include 41, 128, 256, and 512 tokens, representing parts of ECG recordings after tokenization. The method consists of training the foundation model with annotated benchmark databases, then finetuning on a much smaller dataset and evaluating different ECG datasets from those used in the finetuning. The best-performing model achieved an F1 score of 93.33 % to detect AFIB in an ECG segment composed of 41 heartbeats by evaluating different training and testing ECG benchmark datasets. The results showed that a foundation model trained on a large data corpus could be finetuned using a much smaller annotated dataset to detect and classify arrhythmia in ECGs. This work paves the way for the transformation of foundation models into invaluable cardiologist assistants soon, opening the possibility of training foundation models with even more data to achieve even better performance scores.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.