ArticleScientific reports2025
In vitro and in vivo assessment of a new acellular human amnion/chorion membrane device for guided bone regeneration.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Acellular Extracellular Matrix Scaffolds in Regenerative Medicine: Advances in Decellularization and Clinical Applications.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Review
- Regenerative Surgery of the Nonunion of Metacarpals and Phalanges: Amniotic Membrane and Bone Micro-Grafts as a Novel Treatment Approach.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Clinical trial landscape for guided bone regeneration: trend analysis and future perspectives.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Thanks to its unique biological properties, the human amniotic membrane (AM) has shown promising results for guided bone regeneration (GBR), but displays some limitations such as poor space-maintaining ability. This study thus aimed to develop a new amnion/chorion membrane (ACM), with better mechanical properties as well as comparable or improved biological properties for GBR. We first developed a new decellularization method of ACM (DL-ACM) which was validated by DNA staining and quantification, and its cytocompatibility was established in vitro. The thickness of DL-ACM was significantly increased over thirty-fivefold, and its tearing strength and compression strength significantly increased more than tenfold compared to the decellularized AM (DL-AM). In vivo, DL-ACM demonstrated its biocompatibility subcutaneously, and its osteogenic properties were compared to DL-AM and a gold standard membrane in a GBR defect model in rats. Micro-CT and histomorphometric analysis showed that DL-ACM significantly promoted early bone regeneration after 1 week and significantly increased bone regeneration compared to the empty defect and the gold standard membrane over time. In this study, we developed a simple and reproducible method to produce an acellular, non-cytotoxic, and biocompatible DL-ACM. This new membrane is as effective as AM to promote early bone regeneration while demonstrating better biomechanical properties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.