ArticleScientific reports2025
Pavlovian conditioning with the internal stimulus effects of intravenous nicotine heightens later nicotine taking with variation by dose and sex.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- We must look beyond primary reinforcement to understand nicotine use in women.Frontiers in neuroendocrinology · 2026Review
- The inside story: Interoceptive Pavlovian conditioning with the nicotine stimulus.Journal of experimental psychology. Animal learning and cognition · 2025Review
- The rodent electronic nicotine delivery system: Apparatus for voluntary nose-only e-cigarette aerosol inhalation.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We have previously demonstrated that the interoceptive stimulus effects of intravenous nicotine (0.03 mg/kg/inf) can acquire conditioned reinforcing value through appetitive Pavlovian conditioning. In this report, we replicate and extend that work by examining the dose- and sex-generality of this effect. 240 male and female Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into groups defined by infusion dose (0, 0.003, 0.01, or 0.03 mg/kg nicotine). These were further divided into rats who received Paired or Unpaired appetitive conditioning between infusions and sucrose presentations. Interoceptive conditioning took place over 24 daily sessions. The Paired group received 10 trials of response-independent infusions of their assigned nicotine dose followed 30 s afterwards by 4-s access to sucrose. The Unpaired group also received 10 infusions and 10 deliveries of sucrose but spaced 4-8 min apart. Thereafter, the chambers were refitted with nosepokes and all groups could self-administer infusions of their assigned solution according to a progressive ratio schedule. Paired conditioning history enhanced the later self-administration of 0.01 and 0.03 mg/kg/inf nicotine in females. Males self-administered 0.03 mg/kg/inf nicotine-regardless of conditioning history. These data demonstrate that appetitive learning involving the stimulus effects of nicotine can substantially alter the reinforcing effects of nicotine in later self-administration, which effect is both dose- and sex-dependent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.