ArticleScientific reports2025
Artificial intelligence for automatic diagnosis and pleomorphic morphological characterization of malignant biliary strictures using digital cholangioscopy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep Learning-Based Computer-Aided Detection and Diagnosis System for Malignant Biliary Stricture (With Video).Cancers · 2026Article
- Advances in Artificial Intelligence for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: 2026 Update.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Clinical Validation of AI-Assisted Evaluation of Indeterminate Biliary Strictures in Digital-Single Operator Cholangioscopy: A Transcontinental Multicentric Study.Clinical and translational gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Advances in Diagnosis and Treatment With Cholangiopancreatoscopy.Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2026Review
- Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis: Diagnosis, Management, and Clinical Challenges.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Evolving techniques to optimize ERCP-based sampling and evaluation of malignant biliary strictures.Gastroenterology report · 2026Review
- Multiscale tumor characterization in histopathology via self-distilled transformers and topology-aware visual encoding.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Two scopes, one mission: An integrated approach of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic ultrasound to biliary strictures.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Review
- Vendor-Agnostic Vision Transformer-Based Artificial Intelligence for Peroral Cholangioscopy: Diagnostic Performance in Biliary Strictures Compared With Convolutional Neural Networks and Endoscopists.Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Cholangioscopy: A New Frontier for Indeterminate Biliary Strictures.Euroasian journal of hepato-gastroenterologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diagnosing and characterizing biliary strictures (BS) remains challenging. Artificial intelligence (AI) applied to digital single-operator cholangioscopy (D-SOC) holds promise for improving diagnostic accuracy in indeterminate BS. This multicenter study aimed to validate a convolutional neural network (CNN) model using a large dataset of D-SOC images to automatically detect and characterize malignant BS. D-SOC exams from three centers-Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João, Porto, Portugal (n = 123), Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain (n = 18), and New York University Langone Hospital, New York, USA (n = 23)-were included. Frames were categorized based on histopathology. The CNN's performance in detecting tumor vessels, papillary projections, nodules, and masses was assessed. The dataset was split into 90% training and 10% validation sets. Performance metrics included AUC, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV. Analysis of 96,020 images from 164 D-SOC exams (50,427 malignant strictures and 45,593 benign findings) showed the CNN achieved 92.9% accuracy, 91.7% sensitivity, 94.4% specificity, 95.1% PPV, 93.1% NPV, and an AUROC of 0.95. Accuracy rates for morphological features were 90.8% (papillary projections), 93.6% (nodules), 93.2% (masses), and 78.1% (tumor vessels). AI-driven CNN models hold promise for enhancing diagnostic accuracy in suspected biliary malignancies. This multicenter study contributes diverse datasets to ongoing research, supporting further AI applications in this patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.