ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2025
Impact of Stenosis Degree on Outcomes of Stent Placement versus Medical Treatment Alone for Symptomatic Intracranial Stenosis: A Pooled Individual Patient Data Analysis.
Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of Stenosis Severity on Outcomes After Rescue Stenting for Acute Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusions: a Real-world Multicenter Analysis.Clinical neuroradiology · 2026Article
- Propensity score matched analysis of nationwide outcomes for intracranial bypass and stenting for treatment of intracranial atherosclerotic disease.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeWhether differences in stenosis degree affect treatment selection in patients with intracranial artery atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) still remains unclear. This study explores the impact of stenosis degree on outcomes of stent placement compared with medical therapy alone in patients with symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis. MATERIALS AND
methodsPatients with a TIA or nondisabling ischemic stroke, attributed to 70%-99% stenosis of a major intracranial artery, were included. The patient cohort was drawn from the China Angioplasty and Stenting for Symptomatic Intracranial Severe Stenosis and the Stenting and Aggressive Medical Management for Preventing Recurrent Stroke in Intracranial Stenosis trials. The primary outcome was a composite of stroke or death within 30 days or stroke in the qualifying artery territory beyond 30 days through 1 year.
resultsOf 806 patients, 92 patients (11%) met the primary outcome. As the degree of stenosis increased, the risk of the primary end point was significantly lower in the stent placement group (
conclusionsPatients with higher degrees of stenosis are more likely to benefit from stent placement. Patients with intracranial artery stenosis exceeding 85% may be the focus of future studies. If innovations in interventional techniques significantly reduce perioperative risk, the critical threshold of 85% as the degree of stenosis might be reconsidered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.