ArticleJournal of biomedical informatics2025
Precision Drug Repurposing (PDR): Patient-level modeling and prediction combining foundational knowledge graph with biobank data.
Article in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveDrug repurposing accelerates therapeutic development by finding new indications for approved drugs. However, accounting for individual patient differences is challenging. This study introduces a Precision Drug Repurposing (PDR) framework at single-patient resolution, integrating individual-level data with a foundational biomedical knowledge graph to enable personalized drug discovery.
methodsWe developed a framework integrating patient-specific data from the UK Biobank (Polygenic Risk Scores, biomarker expressions, and medical history) with a comprehensive biomedical knowledge graph (61,146 entities, 1,246,726 relations). Using Alzheimer's Disease as a case study, we compared three diverse patient-specific models with a foundational model through standard link prediction metrics. We evaluated top predicted candidate drugs using patient medication history and literature review.
resultsOur framework maintained the robust prediction capabilities of the foundational model. The integration of patient data, particularly Polygenic Risk Scores (PRS), significantly influenced drug prioritization (Cohen's d = 1.05 for scoring differences). Ablation studies demonstrated PRS's crucial role, with effect size decreasing to 0.77 upon removal. Each patient model identified novel drug candidates that were missed by the foundational model but showed therapeutic relevance when evaluated using patient's own medication history. These candidates were further supported by aligned literature evidence with the patient-level genetic risk profiles based on PRS.
conclusionThis exploratory study demonstrates a promising approach to precision drug repurposing by integrating patient-specific data with a foundational knowledge graph.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.