Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39952393›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of pediatrics2025

How Neonatologists Use Genetic Information.

Katharine Press Callahan, Rebecca Mueller, Steven Joffe, Cara Skraban, Nancy B Spinner, Karen Crew, K Taylor Wild, Justin T Clapp, Chris Feudtner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Katharine Press CallahanDivision of Neonatology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA; Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, The Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. Electronic address: callahankp@chop.edu.
Rebecca MuellerDepartment of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, The Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Steven JoffeDivision of Neonatology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA; Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, The Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Cara SkrabanDivision of Neonatology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.
Nancy B SpinnerDivision of Neonatology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.
Karen CrewDivision of Neonatology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.
K Taylor WildDivision of Neonatology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.
Justin T ClappDepartment of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, The Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Chris FeudtnerDivision of Neonatology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA; Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, The Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.

Funding

Managing the Uncertainty of Genetic Information in NeonatesK01HG013114 · NHGRI · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI Katharine Press Callahan · 2023 to 2026
$664k
NHGRI NIH HHS K01 HG013114
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo delineate specific ways in which neonatologists integrate genetic information into their clinical decision making. STUDY

designWe employed chart-stimulated recall, in which neonatologists described how they used genetic tests in specific patient cases, as well as semi-structured questioning about genetic information.

resultsBased on 28 interviews with neonatologists, we document 6 uses of genetic information: making a diagnosis, categorizing/stereotyping as "genetic," informing prognosis, influencing treatment, informing goals of care, and supporting accountability. Both specific genetic diagnoses as well as a general categorization as "genetic" help neonatologists make sense of unusual clinical situations and calibrate their predictions about the future. Predictions, in turn, inform goals of care decisions, the timing of medical technology placement, and neonatologists' self-evaluations. Diagnoses rarely influence day-to-day treatment directly. Neonatologists assign great value to improved prognostication, but simultaneously feel a responsibility to ensure that genetic information is not applied in ways that are overly deterministic or reflect ableism.

conclusionsFrameworks for measuring successes and failures of genetic information in the neonatal intensive care unit need to be aligned with the ways neonatologists use this information. Understanding neonatologists' use creates opportunity to maximize benefit and reduce bias in applying this complex information.

Indexed as

Clinical Decision-MakingGenetic TestingNeonatologistsNeonatologyFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornInterviews as TopicMaleethics/bioethicsgeneticsintensive careneonatology

Identifiers

PMID39952393
PMCPMC12009197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.