GuidelineJournal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH2025
Toward standardization and a concerted vision for platelet proteomics research: communication from the SSC of the ISTH.
Guideline in Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Over the past 3 decades, omics technologies have revolutionized our understanding of platelet molecular content and organization, enabling the systematic analyses of platelet physiology. Among these approaches, proteomics has been especially significant in discovering as well as validating molecular mechanisms of platelet function in health and disease. However, several conceptual and practical challenges continue to limit the full utility of platelet proteomics tools and data. Methodological and analytical inconsistencies remain a key concern, with biological and technical variables exerting substantial influence on study outcomes and interpretation. These issues are compounded by the rapid pace of proteomics tool development and dataset collection, outstripping efforts to standardize best practices and ensure consensus, as platelet proteomics consolidates itself as a tool for research even outside the thrombosis and hemostasis field. In this communication from the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis Scientific and Standardization Committee, we highlight recent advances in platelet proteomics studies, and we identify where collective efforts can strengthen experimental design, execution, and analysis. As a practical recommendation, we encourage platelet biologists to recognize current discrepancies and advance efforts to standardize and customize methods and reporting practices, including blood collection, platelet isolation, data acquisition, and data interpretation. By aligning protocols and ensuring detailed reporting, the field can more effectively integrate proteomics findings and accelerate our understanding of platelet biology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.