Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39952349›Full record

ReviewJournal of molecular biology2025

Identification and understanding of allostery hotspots in proteins: Integration of deep mutational scanning and multi-faceted computational analyses.

Qiang Cui

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of molecular biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Qiang CuiDepartments of Chemistry, Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, 590 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston 02215, MA, USA.

Funding

Computational Analysis of Enzyme Catalysis and RegulationR35GM141930 · NIGMS · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI Qiang Cui · 2021 to 2026
$2.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM141930
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivated by recent deep mutational scanning (DMS) experiments, we have carried out a diverse set of computations to better understand the distribution and contributions of allostery hotspot residues in a transcription factor, TetR. These include extensive atomistic simulations and free energy computations for different functional states of TetR, machine learning analysis of the DMS data and a statistical thermodynamic model for the experimental induction data for the WT protein and a handful of hotspot mutants. Collectively, these computations provided insights into the structural and energetic basis of allostery in TetR, and the distinct contributions of allostery hotspots. The results highlight that the allostery function (i.e., the induction activity) of TetR can be modulated by perturbing both inter-domain coupling and intra-domain properties, such as the population of the binding-competent conformation of each domain. This mechanistic degeneracy qualitatively explains the broad distribution of allostery hotspots across the protein structure observed in the DMS experiments, and also informs the design of strategies aimed at identifying allostery hotspots. The mechanistic framework and the multi-faceted computational approaches are expected to be applicable to the analysis of other allostery systems, especially those sharing the similar two-domain structural topology, and to the design of allostery modulators.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyProteinsAllosteric RegulationAllosteric SiteMachine LearningModels, MolecularMolecular Dynamics SimulationMutationProtein BindingProtein ConformationThermodynamicsProteinsallosterydeep mutational scanningmachine learningmolecular dynamicsstatistical thermodynamic models

Identifiers

PMID39952349
PMCPMC12339756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.